REVIEW 3 cited by
The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation
read the original abstract
After a brief introduction to the principles and promise of quantum information processing, the requirements for the physical implementation of quantum computation are discussed. These five requirements, plus two relating to the communication of quantum information, are extensively explored and related to the many schemes in atomic physics, quantum optics, nuclear and electron magnetic resonance spectroscopy, superconducting electronics, and quantum-dot physics, for achieving quantum computing.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Programmable coherent site-selective spin control in rotating Penning-trap ion crystals
Programmable coherent site-selective Rz gates via synchronized AC-Stark addressing are demonstrated in rotating Penning-trap Be+ crystals, with ~95% fidelity, enabling biskyrmion textures, layer-selective control, and...
-
Programmable coherent site-selective spin control in rotating Penning-trap ion crystals
Demonstration of synchronized laser addressing that achieves site-selective Rz gates with 94.6% fidelity and 1.2% crosstalk in rotating 9Be+ Penning-trap crystals, including biskyrmion textures and layer-selective operations.
-
Feynman's clock and hierarchy-informed sampling for quantum error mitigation
Feynman's clock maps arbitrary circuits onto Hamiltonian dynamics whose BBGKY hierarchy enables polynomial-overhead, controllable error mitigation via informed sampling.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.