Pith Number
pith:6YELB6EV
pith:2026:6YELB6EVCMTZR5DC6737CTWO6O
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?
arxiv:2606.29920 v1 · 2026-06-29 · cs.CL
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{6YELB6EVCMTZR5DC6737CTWO6O}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-06-30T02:17:41.067446Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
f608b0f895132798f462f7f7f14ecef3a359351a4058b08628bad9d2ab1c06e3
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/6YELB6EVCMTZR5DC6737CTWO6O \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: f608b0f895132798f462f7f7f14ecef3a359351a4058b08628bad9d2ab1c06e3
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "1e4255e850ee6f9d7e8ba8ede56f2ee2e6238ff32b812ad46a7bcd2c067e536e",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2026-06-29T07:57:23Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "318c8c78c39965eb5c55d4683305c53259c8f318a0089e3684c8ce50365d1cc5"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2606.29920",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}