IndisputableMonolith.Flight.GravityBridge
IndisputableMonolith/Flight/GravityBridge.lean · 208 lines · 22 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Gravity
3import IndisputableMonolith.Flight.Geometry
4import IndisputableMonolith.Flight.Schedule
5import IndisputableMonolith.Constants
6
7/-!
8# Flight-Gravity Bridge
9
10Connects the ILG (Information-Limited Gravity) weight kernel from `Gravity.ILG`
11to the Flight/Propulsion model.
12
13## Key Questions This Module Addresses
14
151. What is `T_dyn` for a rotating lab device?
162. What weight `w_t` does that imply?
173. Is there any deviation from w=1 (Newtonian) at lab scales?
184. How does the 8-tick schedule interact with ILG predictions?
19
20## RS Claim Structure
21
22The ILG weight kernel is:
23 `w_t(T_dyn, τ₀) = 1 + C_lag * ((T_dyn/τ₀)^α - 1)`
24
25where:
26- `τ₀ ≈ 7.3 fs` (recognition tick)
27- `α = (1 - φ⁻¹)/2 ≈ 0.191`
28- `C_lag` is a coupling constant (typically small)
29
30For a rotating device with period `T_rot`:
31- `T_dyn = T_rot` (natural dynamical timescale)
32- At lab scales, `T_rot >> τ₀` by ~10-15 orders of magnitude
33
34This module formalizes the prediction that `w ≈ 1` at lab scales (null result),
35and provides falsifiers if this prediction fails.
36-/
37
38namespace IndisputableMonolith
39namespace Flight
40namespace GravityBridge
41
42open Gravity.ILG
43open IndisputableMonolith.Constants
44
45noncomputable section
46
47/-! ## Device Dynamical Timescale -/
48
49/-- A rotating device with angular velocity ω has period T = 2π/ω. -/
50def rotationPeriod (ω : ℝ) (hω : ω ≠ 0) : ℝ := 2 * Real.pi / ω
51
52/-- The dynamical timescale of a φ-spiral rotor is its rotation period. -/
53def deviceDynamicalTime (ω : ℝ) (hω : ω ≠ 0) : ℝ := rotationPeriod ω hω
54
55/-! ## ILG Weight at Lab Scales -/
56
57/-- Reference recognition tick τ₀ in seconds (from RS constants).
58 τ₀ = 1/(8 ln φ) in natural units ≈ 7.3 × 10⁻¹⁵ s. -/
59def tau0_seconds : ℝ := 7.3e-15
60
61/-- A typical lab rotation period (e.g., 1000 RPM = 0.06 s). -/
62def typicalLabPeriod_seconds : ℝ := 0.06
63
64/-- Ratio T_dyn/τ₀ for typical lab device. This is enormous (~10¹³). -/
65def labScaleRatio : ℝ := typicalLabPeriod_seconds / tau0_seconds
66
67/-- The ILG exponent α = (1 - φ⁻¹)/2 ≈ 0.191.
68 Using the RS constant φ = (1 + √5)/2. -/
69def ilg_alpha : ℝ := (1 - 1/phi) / 2
70
71/-- Lab-scale weight deviation: for α ≈ 0.191 and ratio ≈ 10¹³,
72 the term (T_dyn/τ₀)^α ≈ (10¹³)^0.191 ≈ 10^2.5 ≈ 316.
73
74 However, C_lag is typically 10⁻³ to 10⁻⁵ for consistency with
75 solar system tests. So the deviation is:
76 w - 1 = C_lag * 315 ≈ 0.3 (at C_lag = 10⁻³)
77
78 This is a TESTABLE prediction if C_lag is not too small.
79-/
80structure LabScalePrediction where
81 T_dyn : ℝ -- Rotation period
82 τ0 : ℝ -- Recognition tick
83 α : ℝ -- ILG exponent
84 C_lag : ℝ -- Coupling constant
85 w_predicted : ℝ -- Predicted weight
86 h_w : w_predicted = 1 + C_lag * (Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α - 1)
87
88/-- Construct a lab-scale prediction for a given device. -/
89def mkLabPrediction (T_dyn τ0 α C_lag : ℝ) : LabScalePrediction where
90 T_dyn := T_dyn
91 τ0 := τ0
92 α := α
93 C_lag := C_lag
94 w_predicted := 1 + C_lag * (Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α - 1)
95 h_w := rfl
96
97/-! ## Connection to 8-Tick Schedule -/
98
99/-- The 8-tick window discipline divides the rotation into 8 phases.
100 Each phase has duration T_phase = T_rot / 8. -/
101def phaseDuration (T_rot : ℝ) : ℝ := T_rot / 8
102
103/-- Number of recognition ticks per phase at lab scales.
104 For T_rot = 0.06 s, T_phase = 7.5 ms, so n_ticks ≈ 10¹².
105 This is far above the 8-tick threshold. -/
106def ticksPerPhase (T_rot τ0 : ℝ) : ℝ := phaseDuration T_rot / τ0
107
108/-- The 8-tick schedule is well-separated from the recognition tick
109 when the number of recognition ticks per phase >> 8. -/
110def scheduleWellSeparated (T_rot τ0 : ℝ) : Prop :=
111 ticksPerPhase T_rot τ0 > 64 -- At least 8² ticks per phase
112
113theorem lab_schedule_well_separated :
114 scheduleWellSeparated typicalLabPeriod_seconds tau0_seconds := by
115 unfold scheduleWellSeparated ticksPerPhase phaseDuration
116 unfold typicalLabPeriod_seconds tau0_seconds
117 -- 0.06 / 8 / 7.3e-15 = 0.0075 / 7.3e-15 ≈ 10¹² >> 64
118 norm_num
119
120/-! ## Null Hypothesis and Falsifiers -/
121
122/-- The null hypothesis: at lab scales, w ≈ 1 (no ILG deviation). -/
123def nullHypothesis (P : LabScalePrediction) (tolerance : ℝ) : Prop :=
124 |P.w_predicted - 1| < tolerance
125
126/-- If C_lag < tolerance / (ratio^α - 1), the null hypothesis holds. -/
127theorem null_holds_if_C_lag_small (T_dyn τ0 α C_lag tolerance : ℝ)
128 (hτ : 0 < τ0) (hT : τ0 < T_dyn)
129 (hα : 0 < α) (hC : 0 ≤ C_lag)
130 (hbound : C_lag * (Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α - 1) < tolerance) :
131 nullHypothesis (mkLabPrediction T_dyn τ0 α C_lag) tolerance := by
132 unfold nullHypothesis mkLabPrediction
133 simp only
134 have hratio_pos : 0 < T_dyn / τ0 := div_pos (lt_trans hτ hT) hτ
135 have hpow_ge_one : 1 ≤ Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α := by
136 have hge1 : 1 ≤ T_dyn / τ0 := by
137 rw [one_le_div hτ]
138 exact le_of_lt hT
139 exact Real.one_le_rpow hge1 (le_of_lt hα)
140 have hdiff_nonneg : 0 ≤ Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α - 1 := sub_nonneg.mpr hpow_ge_one
141 have hprod_nonneg : 0 ≤ C_lag * (Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α - 1) :=
142 mul_nonneg hC hdiff_nonneg
143 -- Simplify |1 + x - 1| = |x| = x (since x ≥ 0)
144 have hsimpl : 1 + C_lag * (Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α - 1) - 1 =
145 C_lag * (Real.rpow (T_dyn / τ0) α - 1) := by ring
146 rw [hsimpl, abs_of_nonneg hprod_nonneg]
147 exact hbound
148
149/-- Falsifier: if measured thrust is nonzero at lab scales,
150 either ILG is wrong or there's a non-gravitational effect. -/
151structure GravityFalsifier where
152 measured_thrust : ℝ
153 predicted_thrust_from_ILG : ℝ
154 discrepancy : ℝ := |measured_thrust - predicted_thrust_from_ILG|
155
156def falsifierTriggered (f : GravityFalsifier) (threshold : ℝ) : Prop :=
157 f.discrepancy > threshold
158
159/-! ## RS-Specific Predictions -/
160
161/-- The RS prediction: C_lag is derived from φ, not a free parameter.
162 Specifically, C_lag = φ⁻⁵ ≈ 0.0902 in the time-kernel formula. -/
163def C_lag_RS : ℝ := Real.rpow phi (-5)
164
165/-- With C_lag = φ⁻⁵ and typical lab scales, the predicted deviation is:
166 w - 1 = φ⁻⁵ * ((0.06 / 7.3e-15)^0.191 - 1)
167 ≈ 0.09 * 315
168 ≈ 28
169
170 This would be a LARGE effect if true! The null hypothesis would fail.
171-/
172def rsLabPrediction : LabScalePrediction :=
173 mkLabPrediction typicalLabPeriod_seconds tau0_seconds ilg_alpha C_lag_RS
174
175/-- The RS prediction yields w ≈ 29, not w ≈ 1.
176 This is either:
177 (a) A falsifiable prediction (test it!)
178 (b) Evidence that C_lag is suppressed at lab scales
179 (c) Evidence that T_dyn ≠ T_rot for a non-gravitationally-bound system
180-/
181def rs_lab_prediction_value : Prop :=
182 25 < rsLabPrediction.w_predicted ∧ rsLabPrediction.w_predicted < 35
183
184/-! ## Interpretation Options -/
185
186/-- Option A: ILG applies at lab scales → large deviation → testable. -/
187def optionA_testable : Prop :=
188 rsLabPrediction.w_predicted > 10
189
190/-- Option B: ILG only applies to gravitationally-bound systems.
191 For a rotating device, T_dyn = ∞ (not bound), so w = 1. -/
192def optionB_bound_only : Prop :=
193 ∀ (device : LabScalePrediction), ¬(device.T_dyn > 0 ∧ device.T_dyn < 1e10) →
194 device.w_predicted = 1
195
196/-- Option C: C_lag is scale-dependent (runs with energy/length).
197 At lab scales, C_lag → 0, preserving w ≈ 1. -/
198structure RunningCoupling where
199 C_lag_of_scale : ℝ → ℝ -- C_lag as function of length scale
200 h_galactic : C_lag_of_scale 1e20 = C_lag_RS -- Galactic scale
201 h_lab : C_lag_of_scale 1 < 1e-10 -- Lab scale (1 meter)
202
203end
204
205end GravityBridge
206end Flight
207end IndisputableMonolith
208