IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PhiForcing
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PhiForcing.lean · 258 lines · 24 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Cost
3import IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence
4import IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DiscretenessForcing
5import IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LedgerForcing
6import IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PhiForcingDerived
7
8/-!
9# Phi Forcing: Self-Similar Discrete Ledger → Golden Ratio
10
11This module proves that **φ is forced by self-similarity in a discrete ledger with J-cost**.
12
13## The Argument
14
151. We have a discrete ledger with J-cost structure (from previous levels)
162. The ledger can reference itself at different scales (self-similarity)
173. If the cost structure is self-similar (same J at every scale), then
18 scale ratios must satisfy J(scale ratio) = J(1) = 0
194. But the only x > 0 with J(x) = 0 is x = 1
205. For non-trivial self-similarity, we need: x ≠ 1 but cost-equivalent to 1
216. This happens when the scale transformation is "free" in the ledger sense
227. The unique solution: x² = x + 1 → x = φ = (1 + √5)/2
23
24## Main Theorems
25
261. `self_similar_scale_eq`: Self-similar scales satisfy x² = x + 1
272. `phi_unique_self_similar`: φ is the unique positive solution
283. `phi_forced`: DiscreteLedger L → SelfSimilar L → Ratio L = φ
29-/
30
31namespace IndisputableMonolith
32namespace Foundation
33namespace PhiForcing
34
35open Real
36
37/-! ## The Golden Ratio -/
38
39/-- The golden ratio φ = (1 + √5)/2. -/
40noncomputable def φ : ℝ := (1 + Real.sqrt 5) / 2
41
42/-- φ satisfies the golden ratio equation: φ² = φ + 1. -/
43theorem phi_equation : φ^2 = φ + 1 := by
44 simp only [φ, sq]
45 have h5 : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 5 := by norm_num
46 have hsq5 : Real.sqrt 5 ^ 2 = 5 := Real.sq_sqrt h5
47 field_simp
48 nlinarith [Real.sq_sqrt h5, sq_nonneg (Real.sqrt 5)]
49
50/-- φ is positive. -/
51theorem phi_pos : 0 < φ := by
52 simp only [φ]
53 have h5 : Real.sqrt 5 > 2 := by
54 have h4 : (4 : ℝ) < 5 := by norm_num
55 have hsqrt4 : Real.sqrt 4 = 2 := by
56 rw [show (4 : ℝ) = 2^2 by norm_num, Real.sqrt_sq (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2)]
57 calc Real.sqrt 5 > Real.sqrt 4 := Real.sqrt_lt_sqrt (by norm_num) h4
58 _ = 2 := hsqrt4
59 linarith
60
61/-- φ > 1. -/
62theorem phi_gt_one : φ > 1 := by
63 simp only [φ]
64 have h5 : Real.sqrt 5 > 2 := by
65 have h4 : (4 : ℝ) < 5 := by norm_num
66 have hsqrt4 : Real.sqrt 4 = 2 := by
67 rw [show (4 : ℝ) = 2^2 by norm_num, Real.sqrt_sq (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2)]
68 calc Real.sqrt 5 > Real.sqrt 4 := Real.sqrt_lt_sqrt (by norm_num) h4
69 _ = 2 := hsqrt4
70 linarith
71
72/-- φ < 2. -/
73theorem phi_lt_two : φ < 2 := by
74 simp only [φ]
75 have h5 : Real.sqrt 5 < 3 := by
76 have h9 : (5 : ℝ) < 9 := by norm_num
77 have hsqrt9 : Real.sqrt 9 = 3 := by
78 rw [show (9 : ℝ) = 3^2 by norm_num, Real.sqrt_sq (by norm_num : (3 : ℝ) ≥ 0)]
79 calc Real.sqrt 5 < Real.sqrt 9 := Real.sqrt_lt_sqrt (by norm_num) h9
80 _ = 3 := hsqrt9
81 linarith
82
83/-- φ > 1.618. -/
84theorem phi_gt_onePointSixOneEight : φ > (1.618 : ℝ) := by
85 simp only [φ]
86 have h5 : Real.sqrt 5 > (2.236 : ℝ) := by
87 have h : (2.236 : ℝ)^2 < 5 := by norm_num
88 rw [← Real.sqrt_sq (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2.236)]
89 exact Real.sqrt_lt_sqrt (by norm_num) h
90 linarith
91
92/-- φ < 1.619. -/
93theorem phi_lt_onePointSixOneNine : φ < (1.619 : ℝ) := by
94 simp only [φ]
95 have h5 : Real.sqrt 5 < (2.238 : ℝ) := by
96 have h : (5 : ℝ) < (2.238 : ℝ)^2 := by norm_num
97 rw [← Real.sqrt_sq (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2.238)]
98 exact Real.sqrt_lt_sqrt (by norm_num) h
99 linarith
100
101/-- φ < 1.8. -/
102theorem phi_lt_onePointEight : φ < (1.8 : ℝ) :=
103 lt_trans phi_lt_onePointSixOneNine (by norm_num)
104
105/-- φ > 1.6. -/
106theorem phi_gt_onePointSix : φ > (1.6 : ℝ) :=
107 lt_trans (by norm_num) phi_gt_onePointSixOneEight
108
109/-- φ⁻¹ = φ - 1 (a key identity). -/
110theorem phi_inv : φ⁻¹ = φ - 1 := by
111 have hphi_ne : φ ≠ 0 := phi_pos.ne'
112 have h := phi_equation
113 -- From φ² = φ + 1, divide by φ: φ = 1 + 1/φ, so 1/φ = φ - 1
114 have h1 : φ^2 / φ = (φ + 1) / φ := by rw [h]
115 have h2 : φ = 1 + φ⁻¹ := by
116 field_simp at h1
117 field_simp
118 nlinarith [phi_pos]
119 linarith
120
121/-- J(φ) = (2φ - 1)/2 - 1 = φ - 3/2 (cost of the golden ratio).
122 Note: J(φ) ≠ 0 because φ ≠ 1. -/
123theorem J_phi : LawOfExistence.J φ = φ - 3/2 := by
124 simp only [LawOfExistence.J]
125 rw [phi_inv]
126 ring
127
128/-! ## Self-Similarity -/
129
130/-- A self-similar structure with scale ratio r. -/
131structure SelfSimilar where
132 /-- The scale ratio -/
133 ratio : ℝ
134 ratio_pos : 0 < ratio
135 ratio_ne_one : ratio ≠ 1
136 /-- Scale invariance is witnessed by a closed geometric scale sequence. -/
137 scale_invariant :
138 ∃ S : PhiForcingDerived.GeometricScaleSequence,
139 S.ratio = ratio ∧ S.isClosed
140
141/-- Self-similarity in a discrete ledger requires the scale ratio to satisfy
142 a specific algebraic constraint: x² = x + 1.
143
144 The argument:
145 - In a self-similar ledger, scaling by r should be composable: r · r = r + 1 (in ledger terms)
146 - This is because the "next scale" (r²) should equal "current + base" (r + 1)
147 - The Fibonacci-like structure forces this constraint -/
148def satisfies_golden_constraint (r : ℝ) : Prop := r^2 = r + 1
149
150/-- Closed geometric self-similarity forces the golden constraint. -/
151theorem self_similar_forces_golden_constraint (S : SelfSimilar) :
152 satisfies_golden_constraint S.ratio := by
153 rcases S.scale_invariant with ⟨G, hratio, hclosed⟩
154 unfold satisfies_golden_constraint
155 rw [← hratio]
156 exact PhiForcingDerived.closure_forces_golden_equation G hclosed
157
158/-- φ satisfies the golden constraint. -/
159theorem phi_satisfies : satisfies_golden_constraint φ := phi_equation
160
161/-- The golden constraint characterizes φ among positive reals. -/
162theorem golden_constraint_unique {r : ℝ} (hr_pos : 0 < r) (hr_eq : satisfies_golden_constraint r) :
163 r = φ := by
164 -- r² = r + 1 has solutions (1 ± √5)/2
165 -- Only (1 + √5)/2 is positive
166 simp only [satisfies_golden_constraint] at hr_eq
167 have h : r^2 - r - 1 = 0 := by linarith
168 -- Use quadratic formula and positivity
169 -- The solutions are (1 ± √5)/2, and only (1 + √5)/2 > 0
170 have h5 : Real.sqrt 5 > 2 := by
171 have h4 : (4 : ℝ) < 5 := by norm_num
172 have hsqrt4 : Real.sqrt 4 = 2 := by
173 rw [show (4 : ℝ) = 2^2 by norm_num, Real.sqrt_sq (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2)]
174 calc Real.sqrt 5 > Real.sqrt 4 := Real.sqrt_lt_sqrt (by norm_num) h4
175 _ = 2 := hsqrt4
176 -- The positive root is (1 + √5)/2
177 have hsq5 : Real.sqrt 5 ^ 2 = 5 := Real.sq_sqrt (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 5)
178 -- Verify φ satisfies the equation
179 have hphi_satisfies : φ^2 = φ + 1 := phi_equation
180 -- Both r and φ satisfy x² = x + 1, and both are positive
181 -- The polynomial x² - x - 1 has exactly two roots
182 -- Since r > 0 and φ > 0, and the other root is negative, we have r = φ
183 nlinarith [sq_nonneg (r - φ), sq_nonneg (r + φ - 1), phi_pos, hsq5]
184
185/-- The golden constraint characterizes φ among positive reals. -/
186theorem phi_unique_self_similar {r : ℝ} (hr_pos : 0 < r) (hr_eq : satisfies_golden_constraint r) :
187 r = φ :=
188 golden_constraint_unique hr_pos hr_eq
189
190/-! ## Discrete Ledger with Self-Similarity -/
191
192/-- A discrete ledger structure (from LedgerForcing). -/
193structure DiscreteLedger where
194 /-- The ledger structure -/
195 ledger : LedgerForcing.Ledger
196 /-- A concrete discrete configuration space witnessing finite step structure. -/
197 discrete_space : DiscretenessForcing.DiscreteConfigSpace
198
199/-- Self-similarity property for a discrete ledger. -/
200def is_self_similar (_L : DiscreteLedger) (r : ℝ) : Prop :=
201 ∃ S : SelfSimilar, S.ratio = r
202
203/-! ## Phi Forcing Theorem -/
204
205/-- **PHI FORCING THEOREM**: In a self-similar discrete ledger, the scale ratio is φ.
206
207If:
2081. L is a discrete ledger (from DiscretenessForcing + LedgerForcing)
2092. L is self-similar with scale ratio r
2103. r satisfies the compositional constraint r² = r + 1
211
212Then: r = φ = (1 + √5)/2 -/
213theorem phi_forced (L : DiscreteLedger) (r : ℝ) (hr : is_self_similar L r) : r = φ := by
214 rcases hr with ⟨S, rfl⟩
215 exact golden_constraint_unique S.ratio_pos (self_similar_forces_golden_constraint S)
216
217/-! ## Consequences of φ -/
218
219/-- The minimum non-trivial cost: J_bit = ln(φ). -/
220noncomputable def J_bit : ℝ := Real.log φ
221
222/-- J_bit is positive. -/
223theorem J_bit_pos : 0 < J_bit := Real.log_pos phi_gt_one
224
225/-- The coherence quantum: E_coh = φ⁻⁵. -/
226noncomputable def E_coh : ℝ := φ^(-5 : ℤ)
227
228/-- E_coh is positive. -/
229theorem E_coh_pos : 0 < E_coh := by
230 simp only [E_coh]
231 exact zpow_pos phi_pos (-5)
232
233/-! ## Summary: The Forcing Chain -/
234
235/-- **PHI FORCING PRINCIPLE**
236
237The golden ratio φ is forced by self-similarity in a discrete J-cost ledger:
238
2391. Discrete ledger with J-symmetry (from previous levels)
2402. Self-similarity: the structure references itself at different scales
2413. Compositional constraint: r² = r + 1 (next scale = current + base)
2424. Unique positive solution: r = φ = (1 + √5)/2
243
244This is Level 4 of the forcing chain:
245Composition law → J unique → Discreteness → Ledger → **φ** → D=3 → physics -/
246theorem phi_forcing_principle :
247 (φ^2 = φ + 1) ∧ -- Golden equation
248 (∀ r : ℝ, r > 0 → r^2 = r + 1 → r = φ) ∧ -- Uniqueness
249 (0 < J_bit) ∧ -- Minimum cost positive
250 (0 < E_coh) -- Coherence quantum positive
251 := ⟨phi_equation,
252 fun _ hr heq => golden_constraint_unique hr heq,
253 J_bit_pos, E_coh_pos⟩
254
255end PhiForcing
256end Foundation
257end IndisputableMonolith
258