IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.RunningG
IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/RunningG.lean · 291 lines · 26 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Constants
3
4/-!
5# C51: Gravitational Running at Nanometer Scales
6
7This module formalizes the prediction that Newton's gravitational constant G
8is not truly constant, but "runs" (strengthens) at nanometer scales.
9
10## The Theory
11
121. **Macroscopic Limit**: G(r) -> G_∞ as r -> ∞.
132. **Nanoscale Enhancement**: At r ≈ 20 nm, G(r) ≈ 32 * G_∞.
143. **Running Exponent**: The deviation follows an exponent β derived from the φ-ladder.
15 β = -(φ - 1) / φ^5 ≈ -0.056.
16
17## Prediction
18
19The effective gravitational constant G_eff(r) follows:
20 G_eff(r) = G_∞ * (1 + |β| * (r / r_ref)^β)
21where r_ref is the scale at which the correction becomes order unity.
22-/
23
24namespace IndisputableMonolith
25namespace Gravity
26namespace RunningG
27
28open Constants
29
30/-- The running exponent for gravitational strengthening.
31 β = -(φ - 1) / φ^5 ≈ -0.056. -/
32noncomputable def beta_running : ℝ := -(phi - 1) / (phi ^ 5)
33
34/-- Numerical bound for beta_running ≈ -0.0557.
35 Proved using φ ∈ (1.61, 1.62). -/
36theorem beta_running_bounds :
37 -0.06 < beta_running ∧ beta_running < -0.05 := by
38 unfold beta_running
39 -- Use phi_fifth_eq: φ^5 = 5φ + 3
40 rw [phi_fifth_eq]
41 -- We want to prove: -0.06 < -(φ - 1) / (5φ + 3) < -0.05
42 have h_phi_pos : 0 < phi := phi_pos
43 have h_denom_pos : 0 < 5 * phi + 3 := by linarith
44 constructor
45 · -- -0.06 < -(φ - 1) / (5φ + 3)
46 rw [lt_div_iff₀ h_denom_pos]
47 have h_phi_lt : phi < 1.62 := phi_lt_onePointSixTwo
48 linarith
49 · -- -(φ - 1) / (5φ + 3) < -0.05
50 rw [div_lt_iff₀ h_denom_pos]
51 have h_phi_gt : 1.61 < phi := phi_gt_onePointSixOne
52 linarith
53
54/-- Effective G at scale r relative to G_infinity. -/
55noncomputable def G_ratio (r r_ref : ℝ) : ℝ :=
56 1 + abs beta_running * (r / r_ref) ^ beta_running
57
58/-- **HYPOTHESIS H_GravitationalRunning**: Gravity strengthens at nm scales.
59 Prediction: G(20nm) / G_inf ≈ 32. -/
60def H_GravitationalRunning : Prop :=
61 ∃ r_ref : ℝ, r_ref > 0 ∧
62 abs (G_ratio 20e-9 r_ref - 32) < 1.0
63
64/-! ## Structural Properties of G_ratio -/
65
66/-- beta_running is strictly negative. -/
67theorem beta_running_neg : beta_running < 0 := by
68 have := beta_running_bounds
69 linarith [this.2]
70
71/-- |beta_running| is strictly positive. -/
72theorem abs_beta_running_pos : 0 < abs beta_running := by
73 exact abs_pos.mpr (ne_of_lt beta_running_neg)
74
75/-- At r_ref = r, G_ratio(r, r) = 1 + |β|.
76 The base (r/r) = 1, and 1^β = 1 for any β. -/
77theorem G_ratio_at_self (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) :
78 G_ratio r r = 1 + abs beta_running := by
79 unfold G_ratio
80 rw [div_self (ne_of_gt hr), Real.one_rpow]
81 ring
82
83/-- G_ratio at r_ref = r is less than 2 (and hence far below 31).
84 Since |β| < 0.06 < 1, we have 1 + |β| < 2. -/
85theorem G_ratio_at_self_lt_two (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) :
86 G_ratio r r < 2 := by
87 rw [G_ratio_at_self r hr]
88 have hbeta := beta_running_bounds
89 have h_abs : abs beta_running < 0.06 := by
90 rw [abs_of_neg beta_running_neg]
91 linarith [hbeta.1]
92 linarith
93
94/-- G_ratio at r_ref = r is less than 31 (needed for IVT with target 32). -/
95theorem G_ratio_at_self_lt_31 (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) :
96 G_ratio r r < 31 := by
97 have := G_ratio_at_self_lt_two r hr
98 linarith
99
100/-- G_ratio at r_ref = r is positive (it equals 1 + |beta| > 1). -/
101theorem G_ratio_at_self_pos (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) : 0 < G_ratio r r := by
102 rw [G_ratio_at_self r hr]; linarith [abs_beta_running_pos]
103
104/-! ## Monotonicity and Unboundedness of G_ratio -/
105
106/-- G_ratio is monotonically increasing in r_ref (for fixed r > 0 and beta < 0).
107 As r_ref grows, (r/r_ref) shrinks, and raising a number in (0,1) to a
108 negative power gives a LARGER result. -/
109theorem G_ratio_mono (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (R1 R2 : ℝ)
110 (hR1 : 0 < R1) (hR12 : R1 ≤ R2) :
111 G_ratio r R1 ≤ G_ratio r R2 := by
112 unfold G_ratio
113 have hab : 0 < abs beta_running := abs_beta_running_pos
114 have hbeta_neg : beta_running < 0 := beta_running_neg
115 suffices h : (r / R1) ^ beta_running ≤ (r / R2) ^ beta_running by
116 linarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h (le_of_lt hab)]
117 apply Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
118 · exact le_of_lt (div_pos hr hR1)
119 · exact div_le_div_of_nonneg_left hr hR1 hR12
120 · exact le_of_lt hbeta_neg
121
122/-- For any target M, there exists R > r with G_ratio(r, R) > M.
123 G_ratio grows without bound as r_ref increases. -/
124theorem G_ratio_eventually_large (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (M : ℝ) :
125 ∃ R : ℝ, R > r ∧ M < G_ratio r R := by
126 by_cases hM : M < G_ratio r r
127 · exact ⟨r, lt_irrefl r |>.elim ▸ ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (le_refl r) (by linarith), hM⟩⟩
128 · push_neg at hM
129 have hM_bound : G_ratio r r ≤ M := hM
130 use r + M + 1
131 refine ⟨by linarith, ?_⟩
132 calc M < G_ratio r r + (M - G_ratio r r + 1) := by linarith
133 _ ≤ G_ratio r (r + M + 1) + (M - G_ratio r r + 1) := by
134 linarith [G_ratio_mono r hr r (r + M + 1) hr (by linarith : r ≤ r + M + 1)]
135 _ = G_ratio r (r + M + 1) + (M - G_ratio r r + 1) := rfl
136
137/-- G_ratio is continuous in r_ref on (0, infinity). -/
138theorem G_ratio_continuous_snd (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) :
139 ContinuousOn (G_ratio r) (Set.Ioi 0) := by
140 unfold G_ratio
141 apply ContinuousOn.add continuousOn_const
142 apply ContinuousOn.mul continuousOn_const
143 apply ContinuousOn.rpow_const
144 · exact ContinuousOn.div continuousOn_const continuousOn_id (fun x hx => ne_of_gt hx)
145 · exact fun x hx => Or.inl (ne_of_gt (div_pos hr hx))
146
147/-- **EXISTENCE THEOREM**: The 20nm gravity prediction is satisfiable.
148 There exists r_ref > 0 with |G_ratio(20nm, r_ref) - 32| < 1. -/
149theorem H_GravitationalRunning_certificate : H_GravitationalRunning := by
150 unfold H_GravitationalRunning
151 have hr : (0 : ℝ) < 20e-9 := by norm_num
152 have h_small := G_ratio_at_self_lt_31 20e-9 hr
153 obtain ⟨R, hRr, hR_large⟩ := G_ratio_eventually_large 20e-9 hr 33
154 have hR_pos : 0 < R := lt_trans hr hRr
155 have h_cont := G_ratio_continuous_snd 20e-9 hr
156 have h_sub : Set.Icc (20e-9 : ℝ) R ⊆ Set.Ioi 0 :=
157 fun x ⟨hlo, _⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le hr hlo
158 have h_ivt := intermediate_value_Icc (le_of_lt hRr) (h_cont.mono h_sub)
159 have h32 : (32 : ℝ) ∈ Set.Icc (G_ratio 20e-9 20e-9) (G_ratio 20e-9 R) :=
160 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
161 obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_lo, _⟩, hc_eq⟩ := h_ivt h32
162 exact ⟨c, lt_of_lt_of_le hr hc_lo, by rw [hc_eq]; simp⟩
163
164/-! ## Q9: Is r_ref Derivable from phi?
165
166**Analysis**: beta = -(phi-1)/phi^5 is derived from phi. But r_ref (the
167scale at which running G reaches a particular enhancement) is determined
168by the IVT -- its value is NOT constrained by the forcing chain alone.
169
170**Current status**: r_ref is a free parameter. Deriving it would require
171either the Fibonacci-square conjecture (N_tau = F_12 - 2 = 142) from
172GravityParameters.lean, or empirical input from short-range experiments. -/
173
174/-- The hypothesis that r_ref lives on the phi-ladder. -/
175def H_rref_phi_ladder : Prop :=
176 ∃ N : ℤ, ∃ r_ref : ℝ, r_ref = ell0 * phi ^ N ∧ r_ref > 0 ∧
177 abs (G_ratio 20e-9 r_ref - 32) < 1
178
179/-! ## Q10: Casimir Force Correction
180
181Running G at 20nm gives G_eff ≈ 32 * G_inf. But G_inf ≈ 6.7e-11 makes
182even the enhanced gravitational force negligible vs Casimir (~10 Pa at 20nm).
183The fractional gravitational correction to Casimir is ≈ 2e-18. -/
184
185/-- Gravitational pressure between two plates. -/
186def gravitational_pressure (G_val rho t enhancement : ℝ) : ℝ :=
187 enhancement * G_val * rho ^ 2 * t ^ 2
188
189/-- The gravitational contribution is negligibly small vs Casimir. -/
190theorem grav_casimir_ratio_negligible :
191 gravitational_pressure 6.674e-11 1e4 1e-6 32 < 1e-10 := by
192 unfold gravitational_pressure; norm_num
193
194/-! ## Explicit r_ref Formula (Path 1a)
195
196Setting G_ratio(r, r_ref) = target and solving for r_ref:
197 target = 1 + |beta| * (r / r_ref)^beta
198 (target - 1) / |beta| = (r / r_ref)^beta
199 r_ref = r * ((target - 1) / |beta|)^(1/beta)
200
201Since beta < 0, the exponent 1/beta < 0, and (target-1)/|beta| > 1 for
202target > 1 + |beta|, so r_ref > r (the reference scale is larger than
203the measurement scale). -/
204
205/-- The explicit r_ref that gives G_ratio(r, r_ref) = target.
206 Derived by inverting the G_ratio formula. -/
207noncomputable def r_ref_exact (r target : ℝ) : ℝ :=
208 r * ((target - 1) / abs beta_running) ^ (1 / beta_running)
209
210/-- r_ref_exact is positive when r > 0 and target > 1. -/
211theorem r_ref_exact_pos (r target : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (ht : 1 < target) :
212 0 < r_ref_exact r target := by
213 unfold r_ref_exact
214 apply mul_pos hr
215 apply Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
216 exact div_pos (by linarith) abs_beta_running_pos
217
218/-- For target > 1 + |beta| (i.e., target above the G_ratio at self),
219 r_ref_exact > r. The reference scale is LARGER than the measurement scale. -/
220theorem r_ref_exact_gt_r (r target : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r)
221 (ht : 1 + abs beta_running < target) :
222 r < r_ref_exact r target := by
223 unfold r_ref_exact
224 have h_base_gt_one : 1 < (target - 1) / abs beta_running := by
225 rw [one_lt_div abs_beta_running_pos]; linarith
226 have h_exp_neg : 1 / beta_running < 0 := by
227 apply div_neg_of_pos_of_neg one_pos beta_running_neg
228 have h_rpow_pos : 0 < ((target - 1) / abs beta_running) ^ (1 / beta_running) :=
229 Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (lt_trans one_pos h_base_gt_one) _
230 calc r = r * 1 := by ring
231 _ < r * ((target - 1) / abs beta_running) ^ (1 / beta_running) := by
232 apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ hr
233 exact Real.one_lt_rpow h_base_gt_one.le h_exp_neg
234
235/-! ## Phi-Ladder Rung Analysis (Path 1b)
236
237For target = 32, r = 20 nm:
238 r_ref = 20e-9 * (31/|beta|)^(1/beta)
239 |beta| ~ 0.0557, 1/beta ~ -17.95
240 31/0.0557 ~ 556.6
241 556.6^(-17.95) ~ 1.83e49
242 r_ref ~ 20e-9 * 1.83e49 ~ 3.66e41 m
243
244In Planck units (ell_P ~ 1.6e-35 m):
245 r_ref / ell_P ~ 2.3e76
246 log_phi(2.3e76) ~ 76 * ln(10) / ln(phi) ~ 76 * 2.303 / 0.481 ~ 364
247
248So r_ref sits near phi-rung N ~ 364.
249
250Significance: 364 = 4 * 91 = 4 * 7 * 13.
251Also: 364 = F_14 - 13 (where F_14 = 377).
252And: 364 = 8 * 45 + 4 = 8 * 45.5 (close to 8 * gap_45 = 360).
253
254The nearest "clean" RS number is 360 = lcm(8, 45) = sync_period from
255Foundation.DimensionForcing. So r_ref ~ ell_P * phi^360 is suggestive. -/
256
257/-- The approximate phi-rung of r_ref for the 20nm/32x prediction. -/
258def r_ref_phi_rung_approx : ℕ := 364
259
260/-- 364 is close to 360 = lcm(8, 45) = the RS sync period. -/
261theorem rung_near_sync_period : r_ref_phi_rung_approx - 360 = 4 := by
262 native_decide
263
264/-- 360 = 8 * 45 (8-tick times gap-45). -/
265theorem sync_period_factored : 360 = 8 * 45 := by norm_num
266
267/-- If r_ref = ell0 * phi^360, the prediction is tied to the sync period
268 from D=3 forcing. This makes r_ref a zero-parameter consequence of
269 the forcing chain (modulo the 4-rung offset). -/
270def H_rref_sync_period : Prop :=
271 ∃ r_ref : ℝ, r_ref = ell0 * phi ^ (360 : ℝ) ∧ r_ref > 0 ∧
272 abs (G_ratio 20e-9 r_ref - 32) < 2
273
274/-- Running G Predictions Certificate (Round 4). -/
275structure RunningGR4Cert where
276 r_ref_explicit : ∀ r target : ℝ, 0 < r → 1 < target → 0 < r_ref_exact r target
277 r_ref_above_r : ∀ r target : ℝ, 0 < r → 1 + abs beta_running < target →
278 r < r_ref_exact r target
279 rung_near_360 : r_ref_phi_rung_approx - 360 = 4
280 hypothesis_exists : H_GravitationalRunning
281
282theorem running_g_r4_cert : RunningGR4Cert where
283 r_ref_explicit := r_ref_exact_pos
284 r_ref_above_r := r_ref_exact_gt_r
285 rung_near_360 := rung_near_sync_period
286 hypothesis_exists := H_GravitationalRunning_certificate
287
288end RunningG
289end Gravity
290end IndisputableMonolith
291