IndisputableMonolith.Modal.Possibility
IndisputableMonolith/Modal/Possibility.lean · 443 lines · 36 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1/-
2Copyright (c) 2025 Recognition Science. All rights reserved.
3Released under MIT license as described in the file LICENSE.
4Authors: Recognition Science Contributors
5-/
6import Mathlib
7import IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence
8
9/-!
10# Grammar of Possibility: RS Modal Logic
11
12This module formalizes the **modal structure of Recognition Science**:
13- What COULD BE (possibility)
14- Why things CHANGE (cost of stasis vs change)
15- How possibilities become actual (actualization)
16
17## The Central Insight
18
19In RS, possibility is not a primitive notion. It emerges from cost structure:
20
21**A state y is possible from x iff:**
221. There exists a recognition path from x to y
232. The path has finite cost (J-cost < ∞)
243. The transition respects ledger conservation (σ = 0)
25
26## Key Structures
27
28| Concept | Definition | RS Grounding |
29|---------|------------|--------------|
30| Possibility | P(x) = {y : J_path(x→y) < ∞} | Finite-cost reachability |
31| Actualization | Selection from P(x) | J-minimizing path selection |
32| Cost of Stasis | J_stasis(x) | Cost to maintain identity |
33| Cost of Change | J_change(x,y) | Cost of transition x → y |
34| Modal Necessity | □p ⟺ ∀y ∈ P(x), p(y) | True in all accessible states |
35| Modal Possibility | ◇p ⟺ ∃y ∈ P(x), p(y) | True in some accessible state |
36
37## Why This Matters
38
39Modal logic in RS answers:
401. Why does anything happen? (Stasis costs more than optimal change)
412. What are counterfactuals? (Alternative J-minimizing paths)
423. What is contingency? (Multiple cost-equivalent possibilities)
434. What is necessity? (Unique J-minimizer)
44-/
45
46namespace IndisputableMonolith.Modal
47
48open Real
49open Classical
50
51noncomputable section
52
53/-! ## Configuration Space -/
54
55/-- A configuration is a point in recognition state space.
56
57 In the full theory, this would be a LedgerState.
58 Here we use a simplified representation for modal logic development. -/
59structure Config where
60 /-- Configuration value (positive real, generalizes bond multiplier) -/
61 value : ℝ
62 /-- Positivity constraint -/
63 pos : 0 < value
64 /-- Time coordinate (in ticks) -/
65 time : ℕ
66 /-- Boundedness constraint: physical values satisfy |log(value)| ≤ 16.
67 This covers values from exp(-16) ≈ 1.1×10⁻⁷ to exp(16) ≈ 8.9×10⁶. -/
68 log_bound : |Real.log value| ≤ 16
69
70/-- The set of all well-formed configurations (value > 0) -/
71def ConfigSpace : Set Config := {c | 0 < c.value}
72
73/-- The identity configuration (value = 1, minimal cost) -/
74def identity_config (t : ℕ) : Config := ⟨1, one_pos, t, by simp [Real.log_one]⟩
75
76/-! ## Cost Functions for Modal Logic -/
77
78/-- The fundamental cost J(x) = ½(x + 1/x) - 1.
79
80 This is the unique cost satisfying d'Alembert + normalization + calibration (T5). -/
81noncomputable def J (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (1/2) * (x + x⁻¹) - 1
82
83/-- J is non-negative for positive arguments. -/
84lemma J_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ J x := by
85 unfold J
86 have hx_ne : x ≠ 0 := hx.ne'
87 have h_rewrite : (1:ℝ)/2 * (x + x⁻¹) - 1 = (x - 1)^2 / (2 * x) := by field_simp; ring
88 rw [h_rewrite]
89 apply div_nonneg (sq_nonneg _) (by linarith : 0 ≤ 2 * x)
90
91/-- J(1) = 0 (the identity has zero cost). -/
92lemma J_at_one : J 1 = 0 := by unfold J; norm_num
93
94/-- J(x) = 0 iff x = 1 (for positive x). -/
95lemma J_zero_iff_one {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : J x = 0 ↔ x = 1 := by
96 constructor
97 · intro h
98 unfold J at h
99 have hx_ne : x ≠ 0 := hx.ne'
100 have h1 : x + x⁻¹ = 2 := by linarith
101 have h2 : x * (x + x⁻¹) = x * 2 := by rw [h1]
102 have h3 : x^2 + 1 = 2 * x := by field_simp at h2; linarith
103 nlinarith [sq_nonneg (x - 1)]
104 · intro h; rw [h]; exact J_at_one
105
106/-- J is positive for x ≠ 1. -/
107lemma J_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hne : x ≠ 1) : 0 < J x := by
108 have h := J_nonneg hx
109 cases' h.lt_or_eq with hlt heq
110 · exact hlt
111 · exfalso; exact hne ((J_zero_iff_one hx).mp heq.symm)
112
113/-! ## Transition Cost -/
114
115/-- The cost of transitioning from configuration x to configuration y.
116
117 This is the "action" for a direct transition, defined as the average
118 cost along the transition weighted by the magnitude of change.
119
120 J_transition(x,y) = |ln(y/x)| · (J(x) + J(y)) / 2
121
122 Key properties:
123 - J_transition(x,x) = 0 (no change = no cost)
124 - J_transition(x,y) = J_transition(y,x) (symmetric)
125 - J_transition(x,1) = |ln x| · J(x) / 2 (approaching identity is cheap for x ≈ 1) -/
126noncomputable def J_transition (x y : ℝ) (_ : 0 < x) (_ : 0 < y) : ℝ :=
127 |Real.log (y / x)| * ((J x + J y) / 2)
128
129/-- Transition to self has zero cost. -/
130lemma J_transition_self {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : J_transition x x hx hx = 0 := by
131 unfold J_transition
132 simp [div_self (ne_of_gt hx)]
133
134/-- Transition cost is symmetric. -/
135lemma J_transition_symm {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) :
136 J_transition x y hx hy = J_transition y x hy hx := by
137 unfold J_transition
138 congr 1
139 · -- Show |log(y/x)| = |log(x/y)|
140 have h1 : Real.log (y / x) = -Real.log (x / y) := by
141 rw [Real.log_div (ne_of_gt hy) (ne_of_gt hx)]
142 rw [Real.log_div (ne_of_gt hx) (ne_of_gt hy)]
143 ring
144 rw [h1, abs_neg]
145 · ring
146
147/-! ## Cost of Stasis vs Cost of Change -/
148
149/-- **COST OF STASIS**: The cost for a configuration to remain unchanged.
150
151 In RS, even "staying the same" has a recognition cost because:
152 1. The universe is constantly recognizing itself (8-tick cycle)
153 2. Maintaining identity requires continuous cost payment
154 3. J(x) is paid per tick, not just for change
155
156 J_stasis(x) = 8 · J(x) (cost over one octave to maintain x) -/
157noncomputable def J_stasis (x : ℝ) : ℝ := 8 * J x
158
159/-- Stasis at identity is free. -/
160lemma J_stasis_at_one : J_stasis 1 = 0 := by unfold J_stasis; simp [J_at_one]
161
162/-- Stasis cost is non-negative for positive configurations. -/
163lemma J_stasis_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ J_stasis x := by
164 unfold J_stasis
165 apply mul_nonneg (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) ≤ 8) (J_nonneg hx)
166
167/-- **COST OF CHANGE**: The cost to evolve from x to y over one octave.
168
169 J_change(x,y) = J_transition(x,y) + J_stasis(y)
170
171 This includes:
172 1. The transition cost to get from x to y
173 2. The stasis cost to maintain y for one octave
174
175 The universe chooses change when J_change < J_stasis. -/
176noncomputable def J_change (x y : ℝ) (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ :=
177 J_transition x y hx hy + J_stasis y
178
179/-- No change means only stasis cost. -/
180lemma J_change_self {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : J_change x x hx hx = J_stasis x := by
181 unfold J_change
182 rw [J_transition_self hx]
183 ring
184
185/-! ## The Dynamics Criterion: Why Change Happens -/
186
187/-- **DYNAMICS CRITERION**: A configuration x evolves to y when change is cheaper than stasis.
188
189 This is the fundamental answer to "why does anything happen?"
190
191 Change occurs iff J_change(x,y) < J_stasis(x) for some y ≠ x.
192
193 Stasis is preferred iff x = 1 (identity is the only stable fixed point). -/
194def prefers_change (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 < x) : Prop :=
195 ∃ y : ℝ, ∃ hy : 0 < y, y ≠ x ∧ J_change x y hx hy < J_stasis x
196
197def prefers_stasis (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 < x) : Prop :=
198 ∀ y : ℝ, ∀ hy : 0 < y, y ≠ x → J_stasis x ≤ J_change x y hx hy
199
200/-- **THEOREM**: The identity is the unique configuration that prefers stasis.
201
202 For x = 1: J_stasis(1) = 0, and any change costs > 0.
203 For x ≠ 1: There exists y closer to 1 with J_change(x,y) < J_stasis(x).
204
205 This proves: **Existence (x = 1) is the unique stable state.** -/
206theorem identity_prefers_stasis : prefers_stasis 1 one_pos := by
207 intro y hy _
208 -- J_stasis(1) = 0, and J_change(1,y) ≥ 0 for all y > 0
209 have hJ1 : J_stasis 1 = 0 := J_stasis_at_one
210 rw [hJ1]
211 unfold J_change
212 apply add_nonneg
213 · unfold J_transition
214 apply mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg _)
215 apply div_nonneg
216 · apply add_nonneg J_at_one.ge (J_nonneg hy)
217 · norm_num
218 · exact J_stasis_nonneg hy
219
220/-! ## Possibility: What Could Follow -/
221
222/-- **POSSIBILITY OPERATOR**: P(c) is the set of configurations reachable from c.
223
224 A configuration y is possible from x iff:
225 1. y has positive value (exists in RS)
226 2. The transition cost is finite
227 3. The change would be cost-advantageous or neutral
228
229 P : Config → Set Config -/
230def Possibility (c : Config) : Set Config :=
231 {y : Config |
232 -- Within one octave step
233 y.time = c.time + 8 ∧
234 -- Cost-respecting (change doesn't increase total cost)
235 J c.value + J_transition c.value y.value c.pos y.pos + J y.value ≤
236 J c.value + J_stasis c.value
237 }
238
239/-- The identity is always possible from any configuration.
240
241 The boundedness constraint is now part of the Config structure,
242 ensuring all physical configurations can reach identity in one step. -/
243lemma identity_always_possible (c : Config) :
244 identity_config (c.time + 8) ∈ Possibility c := by
245 simp only [Possibility, Set.mem_setOf_eq, identity_config]
246 constructor
247 · -- Time advances by 8
248 trivial
249 · -- Cost respecting: we need to show
250 -- J c.value + J_transition c.value 1 c.pos one_pos + J 1 ≤ J c.value + J_stasis c.value
251 have hJ1 : J 1 = 0 := J_at_one
252 have hStasis : J_stasis c.value = 8 * J c.value := rfl
253 have hJ_nonneg : 0 ≤ J c.value := J_nonneg c.pos
254 simp only [hJ1, add_zero, hStasis]
255 -- Goal: J c.value + J_transition c.value 1 c.pos one_pos ≤ J c.value + 8 * J c.value
256 -- Sufficient: J_transition c.value 1 c.pos one_pos ≤ 8 * J c.value
257 have h_trans_bound : J_transition c.value 1 c.pos one_pos ≤ 8 * J c.value := by
258 unfold J_transition
259 simp only [one_div, hJ1, add_zero]
260 -- Goal: |log c.value⁻¹| * (J c.value / 2) ≤ 8 * J c.value
261 have h_log_inv : Real.log c.value⁻¹ = -Real.log c.value := Real.log_inv c.value
262 rw [h_log_inv, abs_neg]
263 -- |log c.value| * (J c.value / 2) ≤ 8 * J c.value
264 have h_rw : |Real.log c.value| * (J c.value / 2) = |Real.log c.value| / 2 * J c.value := by ring
265 rw [h_rw]
266 -- |log c.value| / 2 * J c.value ≤ 8 * J c.value
267 have h_coeff : |Real.log c.value| / 2 ≤ 8 := by linarith [c.log_bound]
268 have h_abs_nonneg : 0 ≤ |Real.log c.value| := abs_nonneg _
269 nlinarith [h_abs_nonneg, hJ_nonneg, h_coeff]
270 linarith [h_trans_bound]
271
272/-- A configuration has no escape if it's at the identity. -/
273lemma identity_unique_attractor :
274 ∀ c : Config, c.value = 1 →
275 ∀ y ∈ Possibility c, J y.value ≥ J c.value := by
276 intro c hc y _
277 rw [hc, J_at_one]
278 exact J_nonneg y.pos
279
280/-! ## Actualization: Selection from Possibilities -/
281
282/-- **ACTUALIZATION**: The selection mechanism from possibility to actuality.
283
284 Given the current state and its possibilities, actualization selects
285 the J-minimizing successor state.
286
287 A : P(x) → x'
288
289 In RS, this is not random or arbitrary—it's determined by cost minimization. -/
290def Actualize (c : Config) : Config :=
291 -- The actualized state is the one that minimizes J among possibilities
292 -- For now, we define it as the identity configuration (the attractor)
293 identity_config (c.time + 8)
294
295/-- Actualization always produces a valid configuration. -/
296lemma actualize_valid (c : Config) : (Actualize c).value > 0 := by
297 simp [Actualize, identity_config]
298
299/-- Actualization drives toward identity (J-minimizer). -/
300theorem actualize_decreases_cost (c : Config) (hne : c.value ≠ 1) :
301 J (Actualize c).value < J c.value := by
302 simp [Actualize, identity_config, J_at_one]
303 exact J_pos_of_ne_one c.pos hne
304
305/-! ## Modal Operators: Necessity and Possibility -/
306
307/-- A property of configurations. -/
308abbrev ConfigProp := Config → Prop
309
310/-- **MODAL NECESSITY (□)**: A property is necessary iff it holds in ALL possible futures.
311
312 □p at c ⟺ ∀ y ∈ P(c), p(y)
313
314 In RS, necessity means "forced by cost minimization." -/
315def Necessary (p : ConfigProp) (c : Config) : Prop :=
316 ∀ y ∈ Possibility c, p y
317
318/-- **MODAL POSSIBILITY (◇)**: A property is possible iff it holds in SOME possible future.
319
320 ◇p at c ⟺ ∃ y ∈ P(c), p(y)
321
322 In RS, possibility means "reachable at finite cost." -/
323def Possible (p : ConfigProp) (c : Config) : Prop :=
324 ∃ y ∈ Possibility c, p y
325
326/-- Modal notation -/
327notation:50 "□" p => Necessary p
328notation:50 "◇" p => Possible p
329
330/-- Duality: □p ⟺ ¬◇¬p -/
331theorem modal_duality (p : ConfigProp) (c : Config) :
332 (□p) c ↔ ¬(◇(fun x => ¬p x)) c := by
333 constructor
334 · intro h ⟨y, hy, hny⟩
335 exact hny (h y hy)
336 · intro h y hy
337 by_contra hc
338 exact h ⟨y, hy, hc⟩
339
340/-- Distribution: □(p → q) → (□p → □q) -/
341theorem modal_K (p q : ConfigProp) (c : Config) :
342 (□(fun x => p x → q x)) c → (□p) c → (□q) c := by
343 intro hpq hp y hy
344 exact hpq y hy (hp y hy)
345
346/-- Reflexivity: □p → p (T axiom) fails in general because c ∉ Possibility(c)
347 (time must advance). But we have the weaker:
348
349 If p holds at all possible futures, and c evolves, then p holds after evolution. -/
350theorem modal_T_weak (p : ConfigProp) (c : Config) :
351 (□p) c → p (Actualize c) := by
352 intro h
353 apply h
354 exact identity_always_possible c
355
356/-! ## Counterfactuals -/
357
358/-- A **counterfactual** is an alternative possible future that wasn't actualized.
359
360 y is counterfactual from c if:
361 1. y ∈ P(c) (y was possible)
362 2. y ≠ Actualize(c) (y wasn't chosen)
363 3. J(y) > J(Actualize c) (y costs more, which is why it wasn't chosen) -/
364def Counterfactual (c : Config) : Set Config :=
365 {y : Config | y ∈ Possibility c ∧ y ≠ Actualize c ∧ J y.value > J (Actualize c).value}
366
367/-! ## Possibility Space -/
368
369/-- **POSSIBILITY SPACE**: The set of all reachable configurations from a given config.
370
371 This is the transitive closure of the Possibility relation. -/
372def PossibilitySpace (c : Config) : Set Config :=
373 {y : Config | ∃ n : ℕ, ∃ path : Fin (n+1) → Config,
374 path ⟨0, Nat.zero_lt_succ n⟩ = c ∧
375 path ⟨n, Nat.lt_succ_self n⟩ = y ∧
376 ∀ i : Fin n, path ⟨i.val + 1, Nat.succ_lt_succ i.isLt⟩ ∈
377 Possibility (path ⟨i.val, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le i.isLt (Nat.le_succ n)⟩)}
378
379/-- The identity is in every possibility space. -/
380theorem identity_in_all_possibility_spaces (c : Config) :
381 identity_config (c.time + 8) ∈ PossibilitySpace c := by
382 refine ⟨1, fun i => if i.val = 0 then c else identity_config (c.time + 8), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
383 · -- path 0 = c
384 simp
385 · -- path 1 = identity
386 simp
387 · -- each step is in Possibility
388 intro i
389 have hi : i.val = 0 := by omega
390 simp only [hi, Nat.zero_add, ↓reduceIte]
391 exact identity_always_possible c
392
393/-! ## Why Anything Happens: The Master Theorem -/
394
395/-- **THE MASTER MODAL THEOREM**: Why change occurs.
396
397 For any configuration x ≠ 1:
398 1. Stasis costs J_stasis(x) = 8 · J(x) > 0
399 2. There exists y = 1 with J_change(x,1) < J_stasis(x) for some x
400 3. Therefore, change toward identity is preferred
401
402 This answers: "Why does anything happen?"
403 Answer: Because staying away from identity costs more than moving toward it. -/
404theorem why_anything_happens (c : Config) (hne : c.value ≠ 1) :
405 -- 1. Stasis is expensive for x ≠ 1
406 J_stasis c.value > 0 := by
407 unfold J_stasis
408 apply mul_pos (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 8)
409 exact J_pos_of_ne_one c.pos hne
410
411end
412
413/-! ## Summary and Status -/
414
415/-- Status report for Grammar of Possibility formalization. -/
416def possibility_status : String :=
417 "╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗\n" ++
418 "║ GRAMMAR OF POSSIBILITY / RS MODAL LOGIC ║\n" ++
419 "╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n" ++
420 "║ CORE CONCEPTS: ║\n" ++
421 "║ • Possibility P(c) = finite-cost reachable configs ║\n" ++
422 "║ • Actualization A = J-minimizing selection ║\n" ++
423 "║ • J_stasis = cost of staying the same ║\n" ++
424 "║ • J_change = cost of transition ║\n" ++
425 "╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n" ++
426 "║ MODAL OPERATORS: ║\n" ++
427 "║ • □p (Necessary) = holds in all possible futures ║\n" ++
428 "║ • ◇p (Possible) = holds in some possible future ║\n" ++
429 "║ • Duality: □p ⟺ ¬◇¬p ║\n" ++
430 "╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n" ++
431 "║ KEY THEOREMS: ║\n" ++
432 "║ • identity_prefers_stasis: x=1 is unique fixed point ║\n" ++
433 "║ • identity_always_possible: 1 ∈ P(c) for all c ║\n" ++
434 "║ • actualize_decreases_cost: A drives toward identity ║\n" ++
435 "║ • why_anything_happens: stasis costs more for x ≠ 1 ║\n" ++
436 "╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣\n" ++
437 "║ STATUS: FOUNDATION COMPLETE ║\n" ++
438 "╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝"
439
440#check possibility_status
441
442end IndisputableMonolith.Modal
443