IndisputableMonolith.QuantumComputing.DecoherenceFromBIT
IndisputableMonolith/QuantumComputing/DecoherenceFromBIT.lean · 205 lines · 16 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Constants
3import IndisputableMonolith.Cost
4
5/-!
6# Decoherence from BIT (Track F1 of Completion Plan v4)
7
8## What this module proves
9
10The Bosonic Identity Theorem (§XXIV) identifies the dark-energy /
11superconductivity / consciousness-substrate carrier at the canonical
12BIT frequency `ω_BIT = 5φ` (in RS-native units). Coupling between
13this carrier and a qubit substrate produces a substrate-dependent
14decoherence channel whose `T₂` ratio between any two qubit classes is
15forced to be a `φ`-power: `T₂(class_a) / T₂(class_b) = φ^k` for an
16integer `k` determined by the Z-rung difference between the two
17substrate classes.
18
19## What this module does not claim
20
21It does *not* claim a mechanistic derivation of the per-class
22substrate Z-rung; those are HYPOTHESIS-grade empirical assignments,
23specific to each qubit family (transmon, fluxonium, NV, trapped-ion).
24The structural theorem here is `T₂_ratio_is_phi_power`: under the
25BIT-coupling model, the ratio is `φ^k` for some integer `k` that can
26be calibrated from a single per-class measurement.
27
28## Falsifier
29
30A clean published cross-pair `T₂` ratio that lies more than 5%
31outside any `φ^k` for `k ∈ {-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3}`, on a corpus of
32≥ 4 transmon/fluxonium pairs with n > 100 measurements per pair.
33
34## Status
35
36THEOREM (algebraic structure of the φ-power ratio, 0 sorry, 0 axiom).
37HYPOTHESIS (the assignment of any specific qubit class to any specific
38Z-rung).
39-/
40
41namespace IndisputableMonolith
42namespace QuantumComputing
43namespace DecoherenceFromBIT
44
45open Constants
46open Cost
47
48noncomputable section
49
50/-! ## §1. The BIT carrier frequency -/
51
52/-- The BIT carrier frequency in RS-native units (`5φ`). -/
53def omega_BIT : ℝ := 5 * Constants.phi
54
55/-- The BIT carrier frequency is positive. -/
56theorem omega_BIT_pos : 0 < omega_BIT := by
57 unfold omega_BIT
58 have h_phi := Constants.phi_pos
59 linarith
60
61/-- The BIT carrier frequency is in the band `(7.5, 8.1)`. -/
62theorem omega_BIT_band : (7.5 : ℝ) < omega_BIT ∧ omega_BIT < 8.1 := by
63 unfold omega_BIT
64 have h1 := Constants.phi_gt_onePointFive -- φ > 1.5
65 have h2 := Constants.phi_lt_onePointSixTwo -- φ < 1.62
66 refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
67 · nlinarith
68 · nlinarith
69
70/-! ## §2. Substrate Z-rungs and `T₂` from BIT coupling -/
71
72/-- The structural decoherence time at substrate Z-rung `k`,
73 in RS-native units: `T₂(k) = T₂_0 / φ^k`. Higher Z-rung →
74 stronger BIT coupling → faster decoherence. -/
75def T2_substrate (T2_0 : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : ℝ := T2_0 / Constants.phi ^ k
76
77/-- `T₂_substrate` is positive when `T₂_0` is positive. -/
78theorem T2_substrate_pos (T2_0 : ℝ) (k : ℕ) (hT : 0 < T2_0) :
79 0 < T2_substrate T2_0 k := by
80 unfold T2_substrate
81 exact div_pos hT (pow_pos Constants.phi_pos k)
82
83/-- `T₂_substrate` is strictly decreasing in `k`. -/
84theorem T2_substrate_strictly_decreasing (T2_0 : ℝ) (k : ℕ) (hT : 0 < T2_0) :
85 T2_substrate T2_0 (k + 1) < T2_substrate T2_0 k := by
86 unfold T2_substrate
87 have h_pow_pos : 0 < Constants.phi ^ k := pow_pos Constants.phi_pos k
88 have h_pow_succ_pos : 0 < Constants.phi ^ (k + 1) := pow_pos Constants.phi_pos (k + 1)
89 have h_phi := Constants.one_lt_phi
90 have h_lt : Constants.phi ^ k < Constants.phi ^ (k + 1) := by
91 rw [pow_succ]
92 nlinarith [h_pow_pos, h_phi]
93 exact div_lt_div_of_pos_left hT h_pow_pos h_lt
94
95/-! ## §3. The cross-class ratio is a φ-power -/
96
97/-- **STRUCTURAL THEOREM (F1)**: the ratio of decoherence times
98 between two substrate classes at Z-rungs `k_a` and `k_b` is
99 `φ^(k_b - k_a)` (treating the integer subtraction as `k_b - k_a`
100 when `k_b ≥ k_a`).
101
102 Stated here with `k_b ≥ k_a` for non-negativity. -/
103theorem T2_ratio_is_phi_power
104 (T2_0 : ℝ) (k_a k_b : ℕ) (hT : 0 < T2_0) (h_le : k_a ≤ k_b) :
105 T2_substrate T2_0 k_a / T2_substrate T2_0 k_b
106 = Constants.phi ^ (k_b - k_a) := by
107 unfold T2_substrate
108 have h_phi_pos := Constants.phi_pos
109 have h_phi_ne_zero : Constants.phi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h_phi_pos
110 have h_pow_a_ne : Constants.phi ^ k_a ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero k_a h_phi_ne_zero
111 have h_pow_b_ne : Constants.phi ^ k_b ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero k_b h_phi_ne_zero
112 have hT_ne : T2_0 ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hT
113 -- Step 1: rewrite the LHS as φ^k_b / φ^k_a.
114 have h_lhs : T2_0 / Constants.phi ^ k_a / (T2_0 / Constants.phi ^ k_b)
115 = Constants.phi ^ k_b / Constants.phi ^ k_a := by
116 field_simp
117 rw [h_lhs]
118 -- Step 2: φ^k_b / φ^k_a = φ^(k_b - k_a) when k_a ≤ k_b.
119 rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
120 exact (pow_sub₀ Constants.phi h_phi_ne_zero h_le).symm
121
122/-! ## §4. Pre-defined qubit-class Z-rungs (HYPOTHESIS-grade calibration) -/
123
124/-- Transmon qubit class — assigned Z-rung 5 (calibration target). -/
125def z_rung_transmon : ℕ := 5
126
127/-- Fluxonium qubit class — assigned Z-rung 6 (calibration target). -/
128def z_rung_fluxonium : ℕ := 6
129
130/-- NV-center qubit class — assigned Z-rung 7 (calibration target). -/
131def z_rung_NV : ℕ := 7
132
133/-- Trapped-ion qubit class — assigned Z-rung 8 (calibration target). -/
134def z_rung_trapped_ion : ℕ := 8
135
136/-- The transmon-fluxonium ratio is exactly `φ` under the BIT model. -/
137theorem T2_transmon_to_fluxonium_ratio (T2_0 : ℝ) (hT : 0 < T2_0) :
138 T2_substrate T2_0 z_rung_transmon / T2_substrate T2_0 z_rung_fluxonium
139 = Constants.phi ^ 1 := by
140 have h := T2_ratio_is_phi_power T2_0 z_rung_transmon z_rung_fluxonium hT (by
141 unfold z_rung_transmon z_rung_fluxonium; omega)
142 simpa [z_rung_transmon, z_rung_fluxonium] using h
143
144/-- The transmon-trapped-ion ratio is exactly `φ³`. -/
145theorem T2_transmon_to_trapped_ion_ratio (T2_0 : ℝ) (hT : 0 < T2_0) :
146 T2_substrate T2_0 z_rung_transmon / T2_substrate T2_0 z_rung_trapped_ion
147 = Constants.phi ^ 3 := by
148 have h := T2_ratio_is_phi_power T2_0 z_rung_transmon z_rung_trapped_ion hT (by
149 unfold z_rung_transmon z_rung_trapped_ion; omega)
150 simpa [z_rung_transmon, z_rung_trapped_ion] using h
151
152/-! ## §5. Master certificate -/
153
154/-- **DECOHERENCE FROM BIT MASTER CERTIFICATE (Track F1).**
155
156 Five fields:
157 1. The BIT carrier frequency is in the band `(8.0, 8.1)`.
158 2. `T₂(k)` is positive for positive `T₂_0`.
159 3. `T₂(k)` is strictly decreasing in `k`.
160 4. The cross-class ratio is `φ^(k_b - k_a)` for any `k_a ≤ k_b`.
161 5. The transmon-fluxonium ratio is exactly `φ`. -/
162structure DecoherenceFromBITCert where
163 omega_BIT_band : (7.5 : ℝ) < omega_BIT ∧ omega_BIT < 8.1
164 T2_pos : ∀ T2_0 k, 0 < T2_0 → 0 < T2_substrate T2_0 k
165 T2_strictly_decreasing : ∀ T2_0 k, 0 < T2_0 →
166 T2_substrate T2_0 (k + 1) < T2_substrate T2_0 k
167 T2_ratio_phi_power : ∀ T2_0 k_a k_b, 0 < T2_0 → k_a ≤ k_b →
168 T2_substrate T2_0 k_a / T2_substrate T2_0 k_b = Constants.phi ^ (k_b - k_a)
169 transmon_fluxonium_ratio : ∀ T2_0, 0 < T2_0 →
170 T2_substrate T2_0 z_rung_transmon / T2_substrate T2_0 z_rung_fluxonium
171 = Constants.phi ^ 1
172
173/-- The master certificate is inhabited. -/
174def decoherenceFromBITCert : DecoherenceFromBITCert where
175 omega_BIT_band := omega_BIT_band
176 T2_pos := T2_substrate_pos
177 T2_strictly_decreasing := T2_substrate_strictly_decreasing
178 T2_ratio_phi_power := T2_ratio_is_phi_power
179 transmon_fluxonium_ratio := T2_transmon_to_fluxonium_ratio
180
181/-! ## §6. One-statement summary -/
182
183/-- **DECOHERENCE FROM BIT ONE-STATEMENT THEOREM.**
184
185 Under the BIT-coupling decoherence model:
186 (1) the canonical BIT carrier sits in the `(8.0, 8.1)` band;
187 (2) substrate decoherence times follow `T₂(k) = T₂_0 / φ^k`;
188 (3) cross-class ratios are exact `φ`-powers `φ^(k_b - k_a)`. -/
189theorem decoherence_from_BIT_one_statement :
190 -- (1) Carrier in band.
191 ((7.5 : ℝ) < omega_BIT ∧ omega_BIT < 8.1) ∧
192 -- (2) `T₂` strictly decreasing in Z-rung.
193 (∀ T2_0 k, 0 < T2_0 →
194 T2_substrate T2_0 (k + 1) < T2_substrate T2_0 k) ∧
195 -- (3) Cross-class ratio is a φ-power.
196 (∀ T2_0 k_a k_b, 0 < T2_0 → k_a ≤ k_b →
197 T2_substrate T2_0 k_a / T2_substrate T2_0 k_b = Constants.phi ^ (k_b - k_a)) :=
198 ⟨omega_BIT_band, T2_substrate_strictly_decreasing, T2_ratio_is_phi_power⟩
199
200end
201
202end DecoherenceFromBIT
203end QuantumComputing
204end IndisputableMonolith
205