IndisputableMonolith.RRF.Hypotheses.PhiLadder
IndisputableMonolith/RRF/Hypotheses/PhiLadder.lean · 153 lines · 15 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
2import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
3import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
4
5/-!
6# RRF Hypotheses: φ-Ladder
7
8The φ-ladder hypothesis: physical scales are organized by powers of φ.
9
10This is an EXPLICIT HYPOTHESIS, not a definitional truth.
11It generates prediction obligations that must be tested empirically.
12
13## The Hypothesis
14
15Privileged physical scales satisfy: X = X₀ · φⁿ for integer n.
16
17Examples:
18- Particle masses: m = B · E_coh · φʳ
19- Timescales: τ = τ₀ · φⁿ
20- Semantic amplitudes: A = φ^level
21
22## Falsification Criteria
23
241. Find a privileged scale that doesn't land near a φ-rung
252. Find two privileged scales whose ratio is not φ^k for any integer k
263. Find a derivation that requires non-integer rung shifts
27-/
28
29
30namespace IndisputableMonolith
31namespace RRF.Hypotheses
32
33/-! ## φ Definition and Basic Properties -/
34
35/-- The golden ratio φ = (1 + √5) / 2. -/
36noncomputable def phi : ℝ := (1 + Real.sqrt 5) / 2
37
38/-- φ is positive. -/
39theorem phi_pos : 0 < phi := by
40 unfold phi
41 have h : 0 < Real.sqrt 5 := Real.sqrt_pos.mpr (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 5)
42 linarith
43
44/-- φ > 1. (√5 > 1, so (1 + √5)/2 > 1) -/
45theorem phi_gt_one : 1 < phi := by
46 unfold phi
47 -- We need: 1 < (1 + √5) / 2 ⟺ 2 < 1 + √5 ⟺ 1 < √5
48 have h5pos : (0 : ℝ) < 5 := by norm_num
49 have hsqrt5 : Real.sqrt 5 ^ 2 = 5 := Real.sq_sqrt (le_of_lt h5pos)
50 have h1sq : (1 : ℝ) ^ 2 = 1 := by norm_num
51 -- √5 > 1 because 5 > 1 and sqrt is monotone
52 have h1 : (1 : ℝ) < Real.sqrt 5 := by
53 have : Real.sqrt 1 = 1 := Real.sqrt_one
54 rw [← this]
55 exact Real.sqrt_lt_sqrt (by norm_num) (by norm_num : (1:ℝ) < 5)
56 linarith
57
58/-- φ² = φ + 1 (the defining property). -/
59theorem phi_sq : phi ^ 2 = phi + 1 := by
60 unfold phi
61 have h5 : Real.sqrt 5 ^ 2 = 5 := Real.sq_sqrt (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) ≤ 5)
62 ring_nf
63 rw [h5]
64 ring
65
66/-! ## The φ-Scaling Action -/
67
68/-- Scale a value by φⁿ. -/
69noncomputable def phiScale (n : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ℝ := x * phi ^ n
70
71/-- φ-scaling is a group action. -/
72theorem phiScale_add (m n : ℤ) (x : ℝ) :
73 phiScale m (phiScale n x) = phiScale (m + n) x := by
74 simp only [phiScale, mul_assoc]
75 congr 1
76 rw [zpow_add₀ (ne_of_gt phi_pos), mul_comm]
77
78theorem phiScale_zero (x : ℝ) : phiScale 0 x = x := by
79 simp [phiScale]
80
81theorem phiScale_neg (n : ℤ) (x : ℝ) :
82 phiScale (-n) (phiScale n x) = x := by
83 rw [phiScale_add, neg_add_cancel, phiScale_zero]
84
85/-! ## The φ-Ladder Hypothesis Class -/
86
87/-- A value is on the φ-ladder if it equals X₀ · φⁿ for some base X₀ and integer n. -/
88structure OnPhiLadder (x : ℝ) (base : ℝ) where
89 rung : ℤ
90 eq : x = base * phi ^ rung
91
92/-- The rung of a value relative to a base (computed via logarithm). -/
93noncomputable def computeRung (x : ℝ) (base : ℝ) : ℝ :=
94 Real.log (x / base) / Real.log phi
95
96/-- A value is "near" a φ-rung if its computed rung is close to an integer. -/
97def nearPhiRung (x : ℝ) (base : ℝ) (tolerance : ℝ) : Prop :=
98 ∃ n : ℤ, |computeRung x base - n| ≤ tolerance
99
100/-! ## The φ-Ladder Hypothesis (Explicit) -/
101
102/-- The φ-ladder hypothesis for a collection of scales.
103
104This is the explicit claim that "privileged scales land on integer rungs."
105It generates prediction obligations.
106-/
107class PhiLadderHypothesis (α : Type*) where
108 /-- The base scale of the ladder. -/
109 base : ℝ
110 /-- Extract the scale value from an element. -/
111 scale : α → ℝ
112 /-- All elements are on the ladder (the hypothesis). -/
113 on_ladder : ∀ x : α, ∃ n : ℤ, scale x = base * phi ^ n
114
115/-- Prediction obligation: if two elements are on the ladder, their ratio is φ^k. -/
116theorem ratio_is_phi_power [PhiLadderHypothesis α] (x y : α) (hy : PhiLadderHypothesis.scale y ≠ 0) :
117 ∃ k : ℤ, PhiLadderHypothesis.scale x / PhiLadderHypothesis.scale y = phi ^ k := by
118 obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := PhiLadderHypothesis.on_ladder x
119 obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := PhiLadderHypothesis.on_ladder y
120 refine ⟨m - n, ?_⟩
121 simp only [hm, hn]
122 have hbase : PhiLadderHypothesis.base (α := α) ≠ 0 := by
123 intro h; rw [h, zero_mul] at hn; exact hy hn
124 have hphi_ne : phi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt phi_pos
125 have hphi_n_ne : phi ^ n ≠ 0 := zpow_ne_zero _ hphi_ne
126 field_simp [hbase, hphi_n_ne]
127 rw [zpow_sub₀ hphi_ne]
128 field_simp [hphi_n_ne]
129
130/-! ## Falsification Interface -/
131
132/-- A falsification witness: a scale that doesn't land on the ladder. -/
133structure PhiLadderFalsifier where
134 /-- The measured scale value. -/
135 observed : ℝ
136 /-- The expected base. -/
137 base : ℝ
138 /-- Tolerance for "near integer" (e.g., 0.1). -/
139 tolerance : ℝ
140 /-- The observed value is NOT near any rung. -/
141 not_near : ¬ nearPhiRung observed base tolerance
142
143/-- If a falsifier exists, the hypothesis is falsified. -/
144theorem falsifier_falsifies (f : PhiLadderFalsifier) :
145 ¬ (∃ n : ℤ, f.observed = f.base * phi ^ n ∧
146 |computeRung f.observed f.base - n| ≤ f.tolerance) := by
147 intro ⟨n, heq, htol⟩
148 apply f.not_near
149 exact ⟨n, htol⟩
150
151end RRF.Hypotheses
152end IndisputableMonolith
153