IndisputableMonolith.Unification.UnifiedRH
IndisputableMonolith/Unification/UnifiedRH.lean · 979 lines · 64 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence
3import IndisputableMonolith.NumberTheory.EulerInstantiation
4
5/-!
6# Unified RH: T1-Bounded Realizability Architecture
7
8This module replaces the former `OntologicalPrimeLedger` (which asserted
9bounded **total** annular cost—directly contradicting the proved
10`not_realizedDefectAnnularCostBounded`) with a structured three-component
11architecture:
12
13## Components
14
151. **Cost Divergence** (`CostDivergent`):
16 A sensor with nonzero charge forces the annular cost to grow without bound.
17 *Proved unconditionally from annular coercivity.*
18
192. **Euler Trace Admissibility** (`EulerTraceAdmissible`):
20 The Euler carrier is convergent, nonvanishing, and has bounded logarithmic
21 derivative at every hypothetical sensor location.
22 *Proved from Euler instantiation data.*
23
243. **Physically Realizable Ledger** (`PhysicallyRealizableLedger`):
25 a sensor-indexed ledger carries a scalar proxy state whose T1 defect stays
26 uniformly bounded.
27 *Euler carrier instance proved.*
28
294. **Boundary Transport** (`DivergenceWitnessesBoundary`):
30 if a realizable Euler ledger were cost-divergent, its scalar proxy would
31 be forced toward the T1 boundary `x = 0`.
32 *Remaining external bridge hypothesis.*
33
34## Proof chain
35
36```
37euler_trace_admissible sensor -- (proved)
38 ↓
39PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor -- (proved for Euler carrier)
40 ↓
41DivergenceWitnessesBoundary sensor -- (from external bridge hypothesis)
42 ↓
43BoundaryApproaching sensor -- (if divergent)
44 ↓
45T1 forbids boundary approach for realizable ledgers
46 ↓
47¬ CostDivergent sensor
48 ↓
49nonzero_charge_cost_divergent sensor -- (proved)
50 ↓
51sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False -- = RH
52```
53
54## Change log
55
56Replaces the old `OntologicalPrimeLedger` / `primes_are_fundamental_ledger`
57with a sharper T1-bounded realizability interface. The proved collapse
58observable and the T1-bounded realizability proxy must be kept distinct, so the
59remaining bridge is treated explicitly as an external hypothesis rather than as
60an unconditional theorem of the current carrier formalization.
61-/
62
63namespace IndisputableMonolith
64namespace Unification
65namespace UnifiedRH
66
67open NumberTheory
68
69/-! ## §1. Cost divergence predicate -/
70
71/-- A defect sensor's trace is cost-divergent if its annular cost exceeds
72any bound under uniform-charge sampling.
73
74Mathematically: the topological floor of the annular cost grows as
75`Θ(m² log N)` for charge `m ≠ 0`, which forces the total cost past any
76finite bound at sufficiently large refinement depth `N`. -/
77def CostDivergent (sensor : DefectSensor) : Prop :=
78 ∀ B : ℝ, ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ (mesh : AnnularMesh N),
79 (∀ n, (mesh.rings n).winding = sensor.charge) →
80 B < annularCost mesh
81
82/-- Nonzero charge forces cost divergence (repackaging of `defect_cost_unbounded`). -/
83theorem nonzero_charge_cost_divergent (sensor : DefectSensor)
84 (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) : CostDivergent sensor :=
85 defect_cost_unbounded sensor hm
86
87/-! ## §2. Euler trace admissibility -/
88
89/-- A sensor has an admissible Euler trace if the Euler carrier infrastructure
90is available at its location:
91
92* **Carrier compatible**: a `RegularCarrier` covers the disk between `Re(ρ)` and
93 the critical line `Re(s) = 1/2`, providing the holomorphic nonvanishing envelope.
94* **Carrier nonvanishing**: `C(σ) ≠ 0` for all `σ > 1/2`.
95* **Carrier derivative bounded**: `|C'/C(σ)| ≤ M_C(σ)` with `M_C > 0` for
96 all `σ > 1/2`.
97
98These three properties are proved for ALL sensors from the Euler product
99convergence data. -/
100structure EulerTraceAdmissible (sensor : DefectSensor) : Prop where
101 carrier_compatible : ∃ (carrier : RegularCarrier),
102 carrier.radius = sensor.realPart - 1/2 ∧ 0 < carrier.radius
103 carrier_nonvanishing : ∀ σ, 1/2 < σ → carrierValue σ ≠ 0
104 carrier_deriv_bounded : ∀ σ, 1/2 < σ → 0 < carrierDerivBound σ
105
106/-- Every `DefectSensor` has an admissible Euler trace.
107
108This follows directly from the Euler instantiation certificate:
109`sensor_carrier_compatible`, `carrier_nonvanishing`, and
110`carrierDerivBound_pos`. -/
111theorem euler_trace_admissible (sensor : DefectSensor) :
112 EulerTraceAdmissible sensor where
113 carrier_compatible := sensor_carrier_compatible sensor
114 carrier_nonvanishing := fun _ hσ => carrier_nonvanishing hσ
115 carrier_deriv_bounded := fun _ hσ => carrierDerivBound_pos hσ
116
117/-! ## §3. T1 cost barrier (re-export) -/
118
119/-- The T1 scalar cost barrier from the Law of Existence:
120approaching the non-existence boundary forces arbitrarily large defect cost.
121
122`∀ C, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ (0,ε), defect(x) > C` -/
123theorem t1_cost_barrier (C : ℝ) :
124 ∃ ε > 0, ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → x < ε →
125 C < IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect x :=
126 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.nothing_cannot_exist C
127
128/-! ## §4. Physically realizable ledgers -/
129
130/-- The carrier-compatible radius attached to a sensor: the distance from the
131sensor location to the critical line `Re(s) = 1/2`. -/
132noncomputable def eulerCarrierRadius (sensor : DefectSensor) : ℝ :=
133 sensor.realPart - 1 / 2
134
135/-- The carrier-compatible radius is positive in the strip. -/
136theorem eulerCarrierRadius_pos (sensor : DefectSensor) :
137 0 < eulerCarrierRadius sensor := by
138 unfold eulerCarrierRadius
139 linarith [sensor.in_strip.1]
140
141/-- A normalized Euler stiffness parameter extracted from genuine carrier data:
142
143`gap(sensor) = M_C(σ₀) * (σ₀ - 1/2) / C(σ₀)`,
144
145where `σ₀ = sensor.realPart`, `M_C = carrierDerivBound`, and `C = carrierValue`.
146
147This packages three concrete Euler ingredients into one dimensionless scalar:
148the carrier log-derivative bound, the admissible strip radius, and the carrier
149amplitude itself. -/
150noncomputable def eulerScalarGap (sensor : DefectSensor) : ℝ :=
151 carrierDerivBound sensor.realPart * eulerCarrierRadius sensor /
152 carrierValue sensor.realPart
153
154/-- The normalized Euler stiffness parameter is strictly positive. -/
155theorem eulerScalarGap_pos (sensor : DefectSensor) :
156 0 < eulerScalarGap sensor := by
157 unfold eulerScalarGap
158 exact div_pos
159 (mul_pos
160 (carrierDerivBound_pos sensor.in_strip.1)
161 (eulerCarrierRadius_pos sensor))
162 (carrier_pos sensor.in_strip.1)
163
164/-- Concrete sensor-indexed scalarization extracted from Euler/carrier data.
165
166At refinement depth `N`, we attenuate the normalized carrier stiffness by the
167scale `1/(N+1)` and then convert it to a positive scalar state
168
169`x_N = 1 / (1 + gap/(N+1))`.
170
171This is no longer a placeholder constant: it is computed from the actual Euler
172carrier value, derivative bound, and admissible strip radius of the sensor. -/
173noncomputable def eulerScalarProxy (sensor : DefectSensor) (N : ℕ) : ℝ :=
174 1 / (1 + eulerScalarGap sensor / (N + 1 : ℝ))
175
176/-- The concrete Euler scalar proxy stays positive at every refinement depth. -/
177theorem eulerScalarProxy_pos (sensor : DefectSensor) (N : ℕ) :
178 0 < eulerScalarProxy sensor N := by
179 unfold eulerScalarProxy
180 apply one_div_pos.mpr
181 have hgap_nonneg : 0 ≤ eulerScalarGap sensor := le_of_lt (eulerScalarGap_pos sensor)
182 have hfrac_nonneg : 0 ≤ eulerScalarGap sensor / (N + 1 : ℝ) := by
183 exact div_nonneg hgap_nonneg (by positivity)
184 linarith
185
186/-- Closed form of the T1 defect on the reciprocal-affine Euler scalar proxy. -/
187private theorem defect_one_div_one_add (t : ℝ) (ht : 0 ≤ t) :
188 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect (1 / (1 + t)) =
189 t ^ 2 / (2 * (1 + t)) := by
190 unfold IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
191 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.J
192 have hden : (1 + t : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by linarith
193 field_simp [hden]
194 ring
195
196/-- The Euler scalar proxy has uniformly bounded T1 defect. -/
197theorem eulerScalarProxy_defect_bounded (sensor : DefectSensor) :
198 ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
199 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
200 (eulerScalarProxy sensor N) ≤ K := by
201 refine ⟨(eulerScalarGap sensor) ^ 2 / 2, ?_⟩
202 intro N
203 let t : ℝ := eulerScalarGap sensor / (N + 1 : ℝ)
204 have ht_nonneg : 0 ≤ t := by
205 unfold t
206 exact div_nonneg (le_of_lt (eulerScalarGap_pos sensor)) (by positivity)
207 rw [eulerScalarProxy, defect_one_div_one_add t ht_nonneg]
208 have hden :
209 (2 : ℝ) ≤ 2 * (1 + t) := by
210 nlinarith [ht_nonneg]
211 have hstep1 :
212 t ^ 2 / (2 * (1 + t)) ≤ t ^ 2 / 2 := by
213 exact div_le_div_of_nonneg_left (sq_nonneg t) (by positivity) hden
214 have ht_le_gap :
215 t ≤ eulerScalarGap sensor := by
216 unfold t
217 have hgap_nonneg : 0 ≤ eulerScalarGap sensor := le_of_lt (eulerScalarGap_pos sensor)
218 have hone_le_nat : (1 : ℕ) ≤ N + 1 := by
219 exact Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.zero_le N)
220 have hone_le : (1 : ℝ) ≤ (N + 1 : ℝ) := by
221 exact_mod_cast hone_le_nat
222 exact div_le_self hgap_nonneg hone_le
223 have hsq :
224 t ^ 2 ≤ (eulerScalarGap sensor) ^ 2 := by
225 nlinarith [ht_nonneg, le_of_lt (eulerScalarGap_pos sensor), ht_le_gap]
226 have hstep2 :
227 t ^ 2 / 2 ≤ (eulerScalarGap sensor) ^ 2 / 2 := by
228 exact div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hsq (by positivity)
229 exact le_trans hstep1 hstep2
230
231/-- A physically realizable ledger attached to a sensor carries a scalar proxy
232state `x_N > 0` whose T1 defect stays uniformly bounded along the realized
233trajectory.
234
235This is the formal interface for the ontology route:
236
237* `admissible` records that the ledger really comes from an admissible Euler trace.
238* `scalarState N` is the scalar proxy state at refinement depth `N`.
239* `scalarDefectBounded` says the realized scalar path never enters the
240 infinite-cost regime of the T1 defect functional.
241
242The key theorem below proves that such a ledger can never approach the T1
243boundary `x = 0`, because `nothing_cannot_exist` would make the defect exceed
244the uniform bound. -/
245class PhysicallyRealizableLedger (sensor : DefectSensor) where
246 admissible : EulerTraceAdmissible sensor
247 scalarState : ℕ → ℝ
248 scalarStatePos : ∀ N : ℕ, 0 < scalarState N
249 scalarDefectBounded :
250 ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
251 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect (scalarState N) ≤ K
252
253/-- A realizable ledger is boundary-approaching if its scalar proxy state can
254be driven arbitrarily close to `0`. -/
255def BoundaryApproaching (sensor : DefectSensor)
256 [PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor] : Prop :=
257 ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N : ℕ,
258 PhysicallyRealizableLedger.scalarState (sensor := sensor) N < ε
259
260/-- T1 forbids a physically realizable ledger from approaching the boundary
261`x = 0`: a uniform T1 defect bound contradicts `nothing_cannot_exist`. -/
262theorem physicallyRealizableLedger_not_boundaryApproaching
263 (sensor : DefectSensor) [PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor] :
264 ¬ BoundaryApproaching sensor := by
265 intro hboundary
266 obtain ⟨K, hK⟩ := PhysicallyRealizableLedger.scalarDefectBounded (sensor := sensor)
267 obtain ⟨ε, hεpos, hε⟩ := t1_cost_barrier K
268 obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hboundary ε hεpos
269 have hlt :
270 K <
271 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
272 (PhysicallyRealizableLedger.scalarState (sensor := sensor) N) := by
273 exact hε
274 (PhysicallyRealizableLedger.scalarState (sensor := sensor) N)
275 (PhysicallyRealizableLedger.scalarStatePos (sensor := sensor) N)
276 hN
277 exact not_lt_of_ge (hK N) hlt
278
279/-
280The auxiliary Euler stiffness proxy `eulerScalarProxy` is the actual
281T1-bounded realizability scalar for the Euler ledger. It stays away from the
282boundary and therefore supports the `PhysicallyRealizableLedger` interface.
283
284The realized collapse observable extracted from the canonical defect family is
285defined separately below. It captures the divergence-to-boundary mechanism, but
286the theorems proved in this file show it cannot itself serve as the uniformly
287T1-bounded realizability scalar.
288-/
289
290/-! ## §5. Concrete collapse mechanism from the realized defect family -/
291
292/-- The total annular cost is nonnegative. -/
293theorem annularCost_nonneg {N : ℕ} (mesh : AnnularMesh N) :
294 0 ≤ annularCost mesh := by
295 exact le_trans
296 (annularTopologicalFloor_nonneg N mesh.charge)
297 (annularTopologicalFloor_le_annularCost mesh)
298
299/-- Concrete collapse scalar extracted from the realized defect family of a
300nonzero-charge sensor:
301
302`collapse_N = 1 / (1 + annularCost(mesh_N))`.
303
304As the realized annular cost diverges, this scalar is forced toward `0`. -/
305noncomputable def realizedDefectCollapseScalar
306 (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) (N : ℕ) : ℝ :=
307 1 / (1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N))
308
309/-- The realized defect collapse scalar is always positive. -/
310theorem realizedDefectCollapseScalar_pos
311 (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) (N : ℕ) :
312 0 < realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N := by
313 unfold realizedDefectCollapseScalar
314 apply one_div_pos.mpr
315 have hcost_nonneg :
316 0 ≤ annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N) :=
317 annularCost_nonneg _
318 linarith
319
320/-- Boundary-approach predicate for the concrete realized-defect collapse
321scalar. -/
322def RealizedCollapseBoundaryApproaching
323 (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) : Prop :=
324 ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N : ℕ, realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N < ε
325
326/-- Cost divergence is impossible for charge `0`. -/
327theorem not_costDivergent_of_charge_zero (sensor : DefectSensor)
328 (hzero : sensor.charge = 0) :
329 ¬ CostDivergent sensor := by
330 intro hdiv
331 obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hdiv 1
332 let mesh : AnnularMesh N := uniformChargeMesh N sensor.charge
333 have hcost : 1 < annularCost mesh := by
334 exact hN mesh (by intro n; rfl)
335 have hexcess_zero : annularExcess mesh = 0 := by
336 simpa [mesh, hzero] using uniformChargeMesh_excess_zero N sensor.charge
337 have hfloor_zero : annularTopologicalFloor N mesh.charge = 0 := by
338 simpa [mesh, hzero] using (annularTopologicalFloor_zero N)
339 have hcost_zero : annularCost mesh = 0 := by
340 unfold annularExcess at hexcess_zero
341 rw [hfloor_zero] at hexcess_zero
342 linarith
343 have hfalse : ¬ (1 < (0 : ℝ)) := by norm_num
344 exact hfalse (by simpa [hcost_zero] using hcost)
345
346/-- Any cost-divergent sensor must have nonzero charge. -/
347theorem costDivergent_charge_ne_zero (sensor : DefectSensor)
348 (hdiv : CostDivergent sensor) :
349 sensor.charge ≠ 0 := by
350 intro hzero
351 exact not_costDivergent_of_charge_zero sensor hzero hdiv
352
353/-- The canonical realized-defect collapse scalar approaches the T1 boundary
354`0` for every nonzero-charge sensor. This is the concrete quantitative
355collapse mechanism replacing the old structural axiom. -/
356theorem realizedDefectCollapseBoundaryApproaching_of_nonzero_charge
357 (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) :
358 RealizedCollapseBoundaryApproaching sensor hm := by
359 intro ε hε
360 let fam := canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm
361 have hfam : fam.sensor.charge ≠ 0 := by
362 simpa [fam, canonicalDefectSampledFamily_sensor] using hm
363 by_cases hεle : ε ≤ 1
364 · let B : ℝ := ε⁻¹ - 1
365 obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := defectSampledFamily_unbounded fam hfam B
366 refine ⟨N, ?_⟩
367 unfold realizedDefectCollapseScalar
368 dsimp [fam, B] at hN ⊢
369 have hden_pos : 0 < 1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N) := by
370 have hcost_nonneg :
371 0 ≤ annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N) :=
372 annularCost_nonneg _
373 linarith
374 have hmul :
375 1 < ε * (1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N)) := by
376 have hgt : ε⁻¹ < 1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N) := by
377 linarith
378 have hεpos : 0 < ε := hε
379 have htmp := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hgt hεpos
380 have hleft : ε * ε⁻¹ = 1 := by
381 field_simp [hε.ne']
382 calc
383 1 = ε * ε⁻¹ := hleft.symm
384 _ < ε * (1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N)) := htmp
385 rw [div_lt_iff₀ hden_pos]
386 exact hmul
387 · have hεgt : 1 < ε := lt_of_not_ge hεle
388 obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := defectSampledFamily_unbounded fam hfam 0
389 refine ⟨N, ?_⟩
390 unfold realizedDefectCollapseScalar
391 have hden_pos : 0 < 1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N) := by
392 linarith
393 have hlt_one :
394 1 / (1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N)) < 1 := by
395 have hden_gt : 1 < 1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N) := by
396 linarith
397 rw [div_lt_iff₀ hden_pos, one_mul]
398 simpa using hden_gt
399 exact lt_trans hlt_one hεgt
400
401/-- Closed form of the T1 defect on the realized collapse scalar. -/
402theorem defect_realizedDefectCollapseScalar
403 (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) (N : ℕ) :
404 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
405 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N) =
406 annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N) ^ 2 /
407 (2 * (1 + annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N))) := by
408 let t : ℝ := annularCost ((canonicalDefectSampledFamily sensor hm).mesh N)
409 have ht : 0 ≤ t := annularCost_nonneg _
410 simpa [realizedDefectCollapseScalar, t] using defect_one_div_one_add t ht
411
412/-- Because the realized collapse scalar approaches `0`, its T1 defect is itself
413unbounded above. This is the exact obstruction to making that scalar the
414uniformly realizable Euler ledger proxy. -/
415theorem realizedDefectCollapseScalar_defect_unbounded
416 (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) :
417 ∀ C : ℝ, ∃ N : ℕ,
418 C <
419 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
420 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N) := by
421 intro C
422 obtain ⟨ε, hεpos, hε⟩ := t1_cost_barrier C
423 obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ :=
424 realizedDefectCollapseBoundaryApproaching_of_nonzero_charge sensor hm ε hεpos
425 refine ⟨N, ?_⟩
426 exact hε
427 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N)
428 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar_pos sensor hm N)
429 hN
430
431/-- The current one-scalar closure target is impossible: the realized collapse
432observable cannot have uniformly bounded T1 defect, because its defect is
433already proved to be unbounded. -/
434theorem not_realizedDefectCollapseScalar_t1_bounded
435 (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) :
436 ¬ ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
437 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
438 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N) ≤ K := by
439 intro hbounded
440 obtain ⟨K, hK⟩ := hbounded
441 obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := realizedDefectCollapseScalar_defect_unbounded sensor hm K
442 exact not_lt_of_ge (hK N) hN
443
444/-! ## §6. Diagnostic one-scalar identification -/
445
446/-- The actual Euler ledger scalar. For charge `0` we stay at the stable value
447`1`. For nonzero charge we use the physically realized collapse observable
448coming from the canonical defect family. -/
449noncomputable def eulerLedgerScalarState (sensor : DefectSensor) (N : ℕ) : ℝ :=
450 if hzero : sensor.charge = 0 then 1
451 else realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hzero N
452
453/-- In the zero-charge sector, the Euler ledger scalar is identically `1`. -/
454theorem eulerLedgerScalarState_eq_one (sensor : DefectSensor)
455 (hzero : sensor.charge = 0) (N : ℕ) :
456 eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N = 1 := by
457 simp [eulerLedgerScalarState, hzero]
458
459/-- In the nonzero-charge sector, the Euler ledger scalar is the concrete
460realized collapse observable. -/
461theorem eulerLedgerScalarState_eq_collapse (sensor : DefectSensor)
462 (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) (N : ℕ) :
463 eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N = realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N := by
464 simp [eulerLedgerScalarState, hm]
465
466/-- The Euler ledger scalar is always positive. -/
467theorem eulerLedgerScalarState_pos (sensor : DefectSensor) (N : ℕ) :
468 0 < eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N := by
469 by_cases hzero : sensor.charge = 0
470 · simp [eulerLedgerScalarState, hzero]
471 · simpa [eulerLedgerScalarState, hzero] using
472 realizedDefectCollapseScalar_pos sensor hzero N
473
474/-- The Euler carrier is physically realizable in the T1-bounded sense with
475realizability scalar given by the bounded carrier-derived proxy
476`eulerScalarProxy`. -/
477noncomputable instance eulerPhysicallyRealizableLedger (sensor : DefectSensor) :
478 PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor where
479 admissible := euler_trace_admissible sensor
480 scalarState := eulerScalarProxy sensor
481 scalarStatePos := eulerScalarProxy_pos sensor
482 scalarDefectBounded := eulerScalarProxy_defect_bounded sensor
483
484/-- Explicit theorem form of the Euler realizability instance. -/
485noncomputable def euler_physically_realizable (sensor : DefectSensor) :
486 PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := by
487 infer_instance
488
489/-- The Euler proxy is itself a realizable scalar path, so it cannot approach
490the T1 boundary. This makes explicit why a separate bridge theorem is needed:
491its bounded carrier scale does not collapse on its own. -/
492theorem eulerScalarProxy_not_boundaryApproaching (sensor : DefectSensor) :
493 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
494 ¬ BoundaryApproaching sensor := by
495 intro hboundary
496 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
497 exact physicallyRealizableLedger_not_boundaryApproaching sensor hboundary
498
499/-! ## §6. Boundary transport from divergence -/
500
501/-- A realizable ledger witnesses boundary transport if cost divergence would
502force its scalar proxy state toward the T1 boundary. This is the sharpened
503replacement for the former ontological exclusion axiom. -/
504class DivergenceWitnessesBoundary (sensor : DefectSensor)
505 [PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor] where
506 toBoundary :
507 EulerTraceAdmissible sensor → CostDivergent sensor → BoundaryApproaching sensor
508
509/-- If the concrete collapse scalar coming from the realized defect family
510approaches `0`, then the Euler ledger scalar approaches the T1 boundary as
511well. After redefining the ledger scalar to be the realized collapse
512observable in the nonzero-charge sector, this becomes a theorem. -/
513class CollapseBoundaryTransport (sensor : DefectSensor)
514 [PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor] where
515 toLedgerBoundary :
516 ∀ (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0),
517 RealizedCollapseBoundaryApproaching sensor hm → BoundaryApproaching sensor
518
519/-- Diagnostic one-scalar theorem: if one forcibly identifies the Euler ledger
520scalar with the realized collapse observable, transport to that scalar is
521immediate by definition. The impossibility theorem above shows why this
522identification cannot also satisfy the T1-bounded realizability interface. -/
523theorem euler_collapse_boundary_transport (sensor : DefectSensor)
524 (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) :
525 RealizedCollapseBoundaryApproaching sensor hm →
526 ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N : ℕ, eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N < ε := by
527 intro hcollapse ε hε
528 obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hcollapse ε hε
529 refine ⟨N, ?_⟩
530 simpa [eulerLedgerScalarState, hm] using hN
531
532/-- Remaining ontology bridge after separating the bounded Euler realizability
533proxy from the realized collapse observable: collapse of the realized defect
534family must transport to boundary approach for the actual realizability proxy. -/
535def EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption : Prop :=
536 ∀ sensor : DefectSensor,
537 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
538 CollapseBoundaryTransport sensor
539
540/-- The old boundary-bridge interface is now recovered as a theorem: divergence
541gives a concrete realized-defect collapse scalar that approaches `0`, and the
542remaining proxy-transport hypothesis converts that collapse into boundary
543approach for the bounded Euler realizability proxy. -/
544theorem euler_divergence_witnesses_boundary
545 (bridge : EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption) (sensor : DefectSensor) :
546 DivergenceWitnessesBoundary sensor := by
547 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
548 letI : CollapseBoundaryTransport sensor := bridge sensor
549 refine ⟨?_⟩
550 intro _ hdiv
551 have hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0 := costDivergent_charge_ne_zero sensor hdiv
552 exact CollapseBoundaryTransport.toLedgerBoundary (sensor := sensor) hm
553 (realizedDefectCollapseBoundaryApproaching_of_nonzero_charge sensor hm)
554
555/-- Explicit theorem form of the proved boundary bridge. -/
556def euler_boundary_bridge
557 (bridge : EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption) (sensor : DefectSensor) :
558 DivergenceWitnessesBoundary sensor :=
559 euler_divergence_witnesses_boundary bridge sensor
560
561/-! ## §6. The ontological exclusion theorem -/
562
563/-- Generic ontological exclusion theorem: any physically realizable ledger
564equipped with a divergence-to-boundary bridge cannot be cost-divergent. -/
565theorem ontological_exclusion_of_realizable (sensor : DefectSensor)
566 [PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor] [DivergenceWitnessesBoundary sensor] :
567 EulerTraceAdmissible sensor → ¬ CostDivergent sensor := by
568 intro hadm hdiv
569 have hboundary : BoundaryApproaching sensor :=
570 DivergenceWitnessesBoundary.toBoundary (sensor := sensor) hadm hdiv
571 exact physicallyRealizableLedger_not_boundaryApproaching sensor hboundary
572
573/-- **Ontological Exclusion Principle.**
574
575For the Euler carrier, admissibility plus the boundary-transport bridge imply
576that cost divergence is impossible. This theorem replaces the old axiom of
577the same name. -/
578theorem ontological_exclusion
579 (bridge : EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption) (sensor : DefectSensor) :
580 EulerTraceAdmissible sensor → ¬ CostDivergent sensor := by
581 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
582 letI : DivergenceWitnessesBoundary sensor := euler_boundary_bridge bridge sensor
583 exact ontological_exclusion_of_realizable sensor
584
585/-! ## §7. The unified RH theorem -/
586
587/-- **Unified RH**: no nonzero-charge sensor is compatible with the
588Euler carrier under the ontological exclusion principle.
589
590Proof chain:
5911. `euler_trace_admissible` — the carrier is admissible at every sensor (proved)
5922. `euler_physically_realizable` — the Euler ledger is T1-bounded (proved)
5933. `euler_boundary_bridge` — divergence would force boundary approach (bridge hypothesis)
5944. `physicallyRealizableLedger_not_boundaryApproaching` — T1 forbids that (proved)
5955. `nonzero_charge_cost_divergent` — nonzero charge IS cost-divergent (proved)
5966. Contradiction: `sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False` -/
597theorem unified_rh (bridge : EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption) :
598 ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor), sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False := by
599 intro sensor hm
600 exact ontological_exclusion bridge sensor (euler_trace_admissible sensor)
601 (nonzero_charge_cost_divergent sensor hm)
602
603/-! ## §8. The unified certificate -/
604
605/-- Certificate packaging the admissibility-based ontology-to-RH deduction.
606
607Each field records one independently verified component:
608* `t1_barrier` — the scalar Law of Existence
609* `admissibility` — every sensor has an admissible Euler trace
610* `realizability` — the Euler ledger is T1-bounded
611* `realized_collapse` — the realized defect-family collapse scalar tends to `0`
612* `t1_no_boundary_crossing` — realizable ledgers cannot approach `x = 0`
613* `boundary_bridge` — an external bridge transports collapse to ledger boundary
614* `divergence` — nonzero charge forces cost divergence
615* `rh` — no nonzero-charge sensor exists -/
616structure UnifiedRHCert where
617 t1_barrier :
618 ∀ C : ℝ, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → x < ε →
619 C < IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect x
620 admissibility : ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor), EulerTraceAdmissible sensor
621 realizability : ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor), PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor
622 realized_collapse :
623 ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0),
624 RealizedCollapseBoundaryApproaching sensor hm
625 t1_no_boundary_crossing :
626 ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor),
627 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := realizability sensor
628 ¬ BoundaryApproaching sensor
629 boundary_bridge : EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption
630 divergence : ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor), sensor.charge ≠ 0 → CostDivergent sensor
631 rh : ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor), sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False
632
633/-- Any supplied Euler bridge hypothesis yields the corresponding unified RH
634certificate. -/
635noncomputable def unified_rh_cert_of_bridge
636 (bridge : EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption) : UnifiedRHCert where
637 t1_barrier := t1_cost_barrier
638 admissibility := euler_trace_admissible
639 realizability := euler_physically_realizable
640 realized_collapse := realizedDefectCollapseBoundaryApproaching_of_nonzero_charge
641 t1_no_boundary_crossing := by
642 intro sensor
643 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
644 exact physicallyRealizableLedger_not_boundaryApproaching sensor
645 boundary_bridge := bridge
646 divergence := nonzero_charge_cost_divergent
647 rh := unified_rh bridge
648
649/-! ## §9. Structural obstruction analysis
650
651The `EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption` demands that collapse of the realized
652defect family (proved for `charge ≠ 0`) transports to `BoundaryApproaching`
653for the bounded Euler proxy. But the bounded proxy is proved NOT boundary-
654approaching. Therefore the bridge, if true, completes a contradiction chain.
655
656The following theorems make the structural tension explicit:
657- The realized collapse scalar approaches `0` (proved).
658- The Euler scalar proxy does not approach `0` (proved).
659- These are **distinct** scalars, so transport between them is nontrivial.
660- No single scalar can simultaneously collapse and remain T1-bounded (proved:
661 `not_realizedDefectCollapseScalar_t1_bounded`).
662
663The bridge hypothesis asks for a *semantic* connection: the physical meaning
664of cost divergence (which drives the collapse scalar toward `0`) must also
665force the realizability proxy toward `0`. This is not a pure inequality; it
666requires relating the annular-cost growth (a topological winding count)
667to the carrier-derived proxy (a normalized Euler stiffness ratio).
668
669**Equivalent classical formulations** of this bridge:
6701. Primes in short intervals: `π(x+x^θ) - π(x) ~ x^θ / log x` for θ < 1/2.
6712. Ledger stiffness: Carleson-type energy of `log ζ⁻¹` bounded at all scales.
6723. Bandlimited explicit formula packing.
673Each of these is known to be **equivalent to RH** (see Fundamental Theorem
674of Classical Obstruction in `planning/RH_UNCONDITIONAL_CLOSURE_PLAN.md`). -/
675
676/-- The bridge hypothesis, combined with proved results, yields a complete
677contradiction for nonzero charge. This lemma isolates the logical core:
678any scalar path that is simultaneously boundary-approaching and not-boundary-
679approaching is absurd. -/
680theorem bridge_contradiction_core (sensor : DefectSensor)
681 [inst : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor]
682 (hba : BoundaryApproaching sensor) :
683 False :=
684 physicallyRealizableLedger_not_boundaryApproaching sensor hba
685
686/-- The structural asymmetry that makes the bridge nontrivial: the collapse
687observable approaches `0` while the realizability proxy stays bounded away
688from `0`. Any proof of the bridge must reconcile these two distinct scalar
689behaviors. This theorem packages both sides as a conjunction. -/
690theorem obstruction_structural_asymmetry (sensor : DefectSensor)
691 (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) :
692 (∀ ε > 0, ∃ N : ℕ, realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N < ε) ∧
693 (letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
694 ¬ BoundaryApproaching sensor) :=
695 ⟨realizedDefectCollapseBoundaryApproaching_of_nonzero_charge sensor hm,
696 by letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
697 exact physicallyRealizableLedger_not_boundaryApproaching sensor⟩
698
699/-- The impossibility of single-scalar closure: no scalar family that
700approaches `0` can also have uniformly bounded T1 defect. This is the
701formal proof that the bridge cannot be discharged by identifying the
702realizability proxy with the collapse observable. -/
703theorem single_scalar_obstruction (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) :
704 ¬ ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
705 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
706 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N) ≤ K :=
707 not_realizedDefectCollapseScalar_t1_bounded sensor hm
708
709/-! ## §10. RH-equivalence of the bridge hypothesis
710
711The following theorems make explicit that `EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption`
712is logically equivalent to RH (the statement that no sensor has nonzero
713charge, i.e., every hypothetical zero of ζ in the strip must have
714multiplicity 0).
715
716Forward direction: `unified_rh` already proves RH from the bridge.
717
718Backward direction: if RH holds, then `CollapseBoundaryTransport` is
719vacuously true because its hypothesis `sensor.charge ≠ 0` leads to
720`False` by RH. -/
721
722/-- RH implies `EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption`. If no sensor has nonzero
723charge, the bridge is vacuously satisfied. -/
724theorem EBBA_of_rh
725 (hrh : ∀ sensor : DefectSensor, sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False) :
726 EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption := by
727 intro sensor
728 letI : PhysicallyRealizableLedger sensor := euler_physically_realizable sensor
729 exact { toLedgerBoundary := fun hm _ => absurd hm (fun h => hrh sensor h) }
730
731/-- `EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption` is logically equivalent to RH.
732
733This theorem makes machine-checkable the observation documented in §9:
734the bridge hypothesis is not weaker than RH — it IS RH expressed through
735the T1-bounded realizability architecture. -/
736theorem EBBA_iff_rh :
737 EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption ↔
738 (∀ sensor : DefectSensor, sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False) :=
739 ⟨unified_rh, EBBA_of_rh⟩
740
741/-! ## §11. RS Ontological Route — Direct T1 Exclusion
742
743The two-scalar architecture (§§1–10) introduced a carrier proxy and a cost-
744tracking collapse scalar, then bridged them with `EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption`.
745That bridge is logically equivalent to RH (`EBBA_iff_rh`).
746
747This section presents the **direct RS ontological route**, which bypasses the
748proxy entirely. The argument is:
749
7501. **T1 (Law of Existence):** `J(0⁺) = ∞`. Near-zero scalars have unbounded
751 cost. Proved: `nothing_cannot_exist`.
752
7532. **Cost divergence:** Charge `m ≠ 0` forces annular cost to grow as
754 `Θ(m² log N)`. Proved: `nonzero_charge_cost_divergent`.
755
7563. **Cost scalar collapses:** The cost scalar `1/(1 + annularCost)` is forced
757 toward zero. Proved: `realizedDefectCollapseBoundaryApproaching_of_nonzero_charge`.
758
7594. **T1 defect diverges:** The T1 defect of the cost scalar diverges.
760 Proved: `realizedDefectCollapseScalar_defect_unbounded`.
761
7625. **Physical realizability requires bounded T1 defect.** A sensor whose
763 physical ledger scalar has unbounded T1 defect violates the Law of
764 Existence and cannot be physically instantiated.
765
766The chain 1–4 is unconditional. Step 5 is the RS ontological principle:
767**when the arithmetic is physical, infinite costs become impossible.**
768
769In the two-scalar framing this appears as a bridge between distinct scalars.
770In the one-scalar framing it is a direct consequence of T1: the physical
771ledger scalar IS the cost scalar, and T1 forbids its defect from diverging. -/
772
773/-- `CostDivergent` is equivalent to nonzero charge. Forward direction is
774`nonzero_charge_cost_divergent`; backward is `costDivergent_charge_ne_zero`. -/
775theorem costDivergent_iff_charge_ne_zero (sensor : DefectSensor) :
776 CostDivergent sensor ↔ sensor.charge ≠ 0 :=
777 ⟨costDivergent_charge_ne_zero sensor,
778 nonzero_charge_cost_divergent sensor⟩
779
780/-! ### §11a. The RS Cost Finiteness Principle
781
782Every recognition event on the physical ledger has finitely bounded annular
783cost. This is T1 applied to the arithmetic:
784
785* T1 proves that the cost scalar `1/(1 + annularCost)` has unbounded T1 defect
786 whenever annular cost diverges (`realizedDefectCollapseScalar_defect_unbounded`).
787* A physically realizable ledger requires bounded T1 defect.
788* Therefore physically realizable recognition events cannot sustain divergent cost.
789
790When the zeta zeros are treated as physical events on the recognition ledger
791(rather than abstract mathematical hypotheses), cost divergence becomes
792ontologically forbidden. This is "making RH physical." -/
793
794/-- **RH from Cost Finiteness.** If no sensor sustains divergent annular
795cost, then every sensor has charge `0`.
796
797NOTE: Cost finiteness for ALL `DefectSensor` structures is
798**not separately provable** in Lean — one can construct a `DefectSensor`
799with `charge = 1`, and `nonzero_charge_cost_divergent` proves it IS
800cost-divergent. The RS physical claim is that such sensors do not
801correspond to actual zeros of ζ; this is expressed through the
802`PhysicalSensor` subtype (§11c) rather than as a global axiom. -/
803theorem rh_from_cost_finiteness
804 (hcf : ∀ sensor : DefectSensor, ¬CostDivergent sensor) :
805 ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor), sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False := by
806 intro sensor hm
807 exact hcf sensor (nonzero_charge_cost_divergent sensor hm)
808
809/-- Cost finiteness for all sensors is logically equivalent to RH. -/
810theorem cost_finiteness_iff_rh :
811 (∀ sensor : DefectSensor, ¬CostDivergent sensor) ↔
812 (∀ sensor : DefectSensor, sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False) := by
813 constructor
814 · intro hcf sensor hm
815 exact hcf sensor (nonzero_charge_cost_divergent sensor hm)
816 · intro hrh sensor hdiv
817 exact hrh sensor (costDivergent_charge_ne_zero sensor hdiv)
818
819/-- The RS Cost Finiteness Principle implies `EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption`. -/
820theorem EBBA_of_cost_finiteness
821 (hcf : ∀ sensor : DefectSensor, ¬CostDivergent sensor) :
822 EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption :=
823 EBBA_of_rh (cost_finiteness_iff_rh.mp hcf)
824
825/-- `EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption` implies cost finiteness. -/
826theorem cost_finiteness_of_EBBA
827 (bridge : EulerBoundaryBridgeAssumption) :
828 ∀ sensor : DefectSensor, ¬CostDivergent sensor :=
829 cost_finiteness_iff_rh.mpr (unified_rh bridge)
830
831/-! ### §11b. Direct T1 Defect Route — One Scalar
832
833The strongest version of the ontological argument uses a single scalar
834and no proxy at all. The cost scalar `1/(1 + annularCost)` is both:
835
836* **The physical ledger entry** (in RS, the ledger records `1/(1 + cost)`)
837* **The T1-testable observable** (its defect IS the cost)
838
839For charge `0`: cost is bounded, cost scalar stays away from `0`, T1 defect
840is bounded. The sensor has a physically realizable ledger.
841
842For charge `≠ 0`: cost diverges, cost scalar → `0`, T1 defect → `∞`.
843The sensor **cannot** have a physically realizable ledger.
844
845T1 says: only sensors with physically realizable ledgers exist.
846Therefore only charge-`0` sensors exist. That is RH. -/
847
848/-- **Direct T1 exclusion**: if the cost scalar's T1 defect were bounded for
849a nonzero-charge sensor, that contradicts the proved divergence. This is the
850one-scalar core of the RS ontological argument. -/
851theorem direct_t1_exclusion (sensor : DefectSensor) (hm : sensor.charge ≠ 0) :
852 ¬ ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
853 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
854 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N) ≤ K :=
855 not_realizedDefectCollapseScalar_t1_bounded sensor hm
856
857/-- For charge `0`, the Euler ledger scalar `1` has T1 defect `0` — perfectly
858bounded. The charge-`0` sector IS physically realizable. -/
859theorem charge_zero_cost_scalar_t1_bounded (sensor : DefectSensor)
860 (hzero : sensor.charge = 0) :
861 ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
862 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
863 (eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N) ≤ K := by
864 refine ⟨0, fun N => ?_⟩
865 simp [eulerLedgerScalarState, hzero,
866 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect_at_one]
867
868/-- The full ontological dichotomy: the cost scalar is T1-bounded iff
869charge `= 0`. This IS the RS ontological argument for RH:
870
871* Charge `0` ↔ bounded T1 defect ↔ physically realizable ↔ exists
872* Charge `≠ 0` ↔ unbounded T1 defect ↔ not realizable ↔ does not exist -/
873theorem ontological_dichotomy (sensor : DefectSensor) :
874 (sensor.charge = 0) ↔
875 ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
876 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
877 (eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N) ≤ K := by
878 constructor
879 · exact charge_zero_cost_scalar_t1_bounded sensor
880 · intro ⟨K, hK⟩
881 by_contra hm
882 have : ∀ N, eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N =
883 realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N := by
884 intro N; exact eulerLedgerScalarState_eq_collapse sensor hm N
885 have hK' : ∀ N,
886 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
887 (realizedDefectCollapseScalar sensor hm N) ≤ K := by
888 intro N; rw [← this N]; exact hK N
889 exact direct_t1_exclusion sensor hm ⟨K, hK'⟩
890
891/-! ### §11c. Physical Existence — the Sound Formalization
892
893A `DefectSensor` is a mathematical structure that can be constructed with
894any integer charge. In particular, `{ charge := 1, realPart := 3/4, ... }`
895is a valid Lean term. Therefore the statement `∀ sensor, charge = 0` is
896**false** in Lean — it is refuted by construction.
897
898The RS ontological argument does NOT claim that all `DefectSensor` structures
899have charge `0`. It claims that all **physically realizable** sensors have
900charge `0` — where physical realizability means the cost scalar has bounded
901T1 defect.
902
903`ontological_dichotomy` proves **unconditionally**:
904
905 `charge = 0 ↔ PhysicallyExists sensor`
906
907This immediately gives: every physically existing sensor has charge `0`.
908No axioms. No hypotheses. Machine-verified from T1 alone.
909
910The RS argument for RH is then:
9111. `ontological_dichotomy` — PROVED: charge = 0 ↔ T1-bounded (no custom axioms)
9122. ζ zeros are physical events → T1-bounded (RS physical claim, not a Lean axiom)
9133. Therefore all ζ zeros have charge 0 (= RH)
914
915Step 1 is the mathematical content. Step 2 is the physical interpretation.
916Step 3 follows from 1 and 2. The Lean formalization captures step 1
917completely and lets step 2 be expressed as the `PhysicalSensor` subtype. -/
918
919/-- A sensor physically exists iff its cost scalar has bounded T1 defect.
920This is the RS existence criterion applied to the arithmetic ledger. -/
921def PhysicallyExists (sensor : DefectSensor) : Prop :=
922 ∃ K : ℝ, ∀ N : ℕ,
923 IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LawOfExistence.defect
924 (eulerLedgerScalarState sensor N) ≤ K
925
926/-- `ontological_dichotomy` restated: charge = 0 ↔ physically exists. -/
927theorem charge_zero_iff_physicallyExists (sensor : DefectSensor) :
928 sensor.charge = 0 ↔ PhysicallyExists sensor :=
929 ontological_dichotomy sensor
930
931/-- The subtype of physically existing sensors — those whose cost scalar
932has bounded T1 defect. In RS, these are the sensors that correspond to
933actual recognition events on the physical ledger. -/
934def PhysicalSensor := { sensor : DefectSensor // PhysicallyExists sensor }
935
936/-- **RS Ontological Theorem**: every physically existing sensor has
937charge `0`.
938
939This is the core RS result. It is:
940* Unconditional — no hypotheses beyond the subtype constraint
941* Axiom-free — depends only on `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`
942* A direct corollary of `ontological_dichotomy`
943
944In RS language: the Law of Existence (T1) forces every physical recognition
945event to have zero topological charge. Nonzero charge requires divergent
946cost, which T1 forbids for physically realizable ledger entries. -/
947theorem physical_sensor_charge_zero (ps : PhysicalSensor) :
948 ps.val.charge = 0 :=
949 (ontological_dichotomy ps.val).mpr ps.property
950
951/-- **RH from the ontological dichotomy.** If every sensor physically exists,
952then every sensor has charge `0`. -/
953theorem rh_from_ontological_dichotomy
954 (h : ∀ sensor : DefectSensor, PhysicallyExists sensor) :
955 ∀ (sensor : DefectSensor), sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False := by
956 intro sensor hm
957 exact hm ((ontological_dichotomy sensor).mpr (h sensor))
958
959/-- The converse: RH implies all sensors physically exist (vacuously —
960charge `0` sensors are T1-bounded). -/
961theorem all_physicallyExist_of_rh
962 (hrh : ∀ sensor : DefectSensor, sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False) :
963 ∀ sensor : DefectSensor, PhysicallyExists sensor := by
964 intro sensor
965 exact (ontological_dichotomy sensor).mp (by
966 by_contra hm
967 exact hrh sensor hm)
968
969/-- **RH ↔ all sensors physically exist.** Machine-verified equivalence
970between the number-theoretic statement and the RS physical principle. -/
971theorem rh_iff_all_physical :
972 (∀ sensor : DefectSensor, sensor.charge ≠ 0 → False) ↔
973 (∀ sensor : DefectSensor, PhysicallyExists sensor) :=
974 ⟨all_physicallyExist_of_rh, rh_from_ontological_dichotomy⟩
975
976end UnifiedRH
977end Unification
978end IndisputableMonolith
979