Pith. sign in
module module high

IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.SevenGaps.MeasureInvarianceNoGo

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Relabeling invariance, positivity, and normalization do not uniquely select a path-sum weight on the bounded configuration class. The module exhibits finite complexes (empty and two-point) that carry several distinct normalized positive Aut-invariant measures. Seven-Gaps gravity authors cite it as the exact substrate blocker for Gap-2 measure selection. The argument is by explicit finite models and Aut-cardinality computations.

claimOn the scoped class of bounded complexes at complexity cap $B$, the axiom package of Aut-relabeling invariance, positivity, and normalization does not determine a unique path-sum weight $w$. Explicit counter-models include the empty complex and a two-point complex, each admitting multiple distinct measures (uniform, squared, and power measures) that satisfy the same axioms.

background

Gap-2 of the Seven Gaps gravity program asks for a canonical path-sum measure on configuration space for the recognition ledger $Z_{RS}$. Upstream, PathSumMeasure shows that the scoped class BoundedComplex at cap $B$ is a finite type via an explicit coding equivalence, so discrete probability weights are well-defined on a finite set of incidence configurations.

This module isolates a named axiom package for a candidate weight $w$: invariance under automorphisms (relabelings of the complex), positivity, and normalization. The no-go theorem is scoped exactly to that package. Sibling constructions introduce the empty complex and a two-point complex, compute their automorphism groups and cardinalities, and define several Aut-invariant measures on them (uniform $1/|\mathrm{Aut}|$, squared, and power variants).

proof idea

The module is an explicit counterexample factory, not an abstract uniqueness obstruction. It packages the named invariance axioms, then builds two finite test objects: the empty complex (trivial Aut) and a two-point complex with a nontrivial Aut group, together with equivalences that fix $|\mathrm{Aut}|$. On these objects it defines several measures (uniform, squared, power) and checks that each satisfies the same invariance, positivity, and normalization axioms. Distinct weights meeting one axiom set yield the no-go. Downstream blockers quote that non-uniqueness directly.

why it matters in Recognition Science

MeasureSubstrateBlocker cites this module as the theorem that relabeling invariance, positivity, and normalization do not select a path-sum measure, and pairs it with the gauge-counting preflight that $|\mathrm{Aut}|^{-1}$ mass needs an extra MODEL premise. GaugeCountingInevitableReasons and InsertionAsymmetryInevitableReasons import it into necessary-reasons censuses for Gap-2 targets (physical mass $\nu=1/|\mathrm{Aut}|$, or asymmetric birth/death rate laws). Hostile-probe and $Z_q$ phase-structure modules also depend on the no-go as substrate. In the Seven Gaps gravity lane it forces the framework past pure invariance toward gauge-counting or insertion-asymmetry principles whenever a unique physical measure is required.

scope and limits

used by (5)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (1)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (26)