Pith. sign in
module module high

IndisputableMonolith.Holography.RecordCostAsymmetry

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Defines record cost of a finite map as base-2 log of image cardinality: the independent binary distinctions the map actually performs. That is the image (rank) side of the rank-nullity split the ledger floor charges. Holography workers cite it to separate performed records from fiber microstate cost when naming the area-law coefficient selector. The module packages the definition with zero-cost lemmas, closed-map and domino identities, and the forced one-vs-two multiplicity selector.

claimFor a finite map $f:X\to Y$, record cost is $\log_2|\mathrm{im}\,f|$: the number of independent binary distinctions $f$ performs. Microstate cost is the complementary fiber (nullity) contribution. The ledger floor sums only posted performed distinctions, so only record cost enters the holographic rank/nullity selector between recognition multiplicities one and two.

background

RS holography splits the recognition-pixel area $a_{\mathrm{pix}}=\kappa\cdot H\cdot\ell_P^2$ (the "4" in Bekenstein-Hawking $S=A/4$) into three separately derived pieces: the integer coefficient, the per-event entropy $H=(\phi+2)\log\phi$, and the area scale $\ell_P^2$. Upstream modules already force $H$ and attack the integer on the $D=3$, eight-tick ($2^3$) lattice; $\ell_P^2$ remains blocked by a scale-invariance no-go.

CoefficientBridge and the holography panel treat $\kappa$ as a physical selector to name, not a numeral for decide to pick among labelled integers. EdgeSectorBridge relocates the live candidate away from a naive four-sector entropy reading. RecognitionMultiplicity encodes the selector as a T-1 ledger rank-consistency check, conditional on a modeling choice.

This module supplies the image-side cost that the ledger actually charges: distinctions performed by a finite map, as opposed to unused fiber microstates.

proof idea

Definition-led module, not a single theorem. recordCost is $\mathrm{Nat.log2}$ of image cardinality for an arbitrary finite map; microstateCost is the complementary fiber side. Supporting lemmas: $\log_2$ vanishes on cardinalities $\le 1$; constant maps and more general zero-image cases give record cost zero; closed-map and domino identities relate composite recording; each fiber posts one record under the stated posting rule; record cost equals recognition multiplicity in the one- and two-outcome cases; selector_forced packages the rank-side choice the ledger floor forces. Argument shape is definition plus elementary finite-cardinality and log identities, not a deep existence proof.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Feeds KeystoneFactorThree, whose doc-comment states that the rank/nullity selector from RecordCostAsymmetry leaves one explicit physical premise for a conditional exclusion of the microstate reading of the area-law coefficient (panel-greenlit Live Bet 2). Without a clean split between performed records and fiber cost, the coefficient $\kappa$ collapses back into an ambiguous integer label among 4, 3, 2, 1.

In the broader chain this sits under PixelLocal's attack on the integer factor on the forced $D=3$, eight-tick substrate, and under CoefficientBridge's demand that the selector be named rather than computed. It does not close the full Bekenstein $1/4$ derivation; it isolates the ledger-charged rank side so downstream exclusion structure can bite.

scope and limits

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (4)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (24)