IndisputableMonolith.StandardModel.ElectroweakBreaking
Module defining the Higgs sector in Recognition Science units: the Mexican-hat potential, vacuum expectation value, and the resulting W/Z and Higgs masses. A Standard Model theorist would cite it for the RS-native vev and mass ladder. Definitions and a minimization claim for the J-cost of the Higgs field; no deep forcing proofs live here.
claimThe module packages the Higgs potential $V(H)$, the vacuum expectation value $v=\langle H\rangle$, the observed $v$, Higgs mass $m_H$, $W$ and $Z$ masses $m_W,m_Z$, the ratio $m_W/m_Z$, and the J-cost of the Higgs configuration, together with the claim that the vev minimizes that cost.
background
Recognition Science works in RS-native units with $c=1$ and a discrete ledger whose cost is the J-functional $J(x)=(x+x^{-1})/2-1$. The golden ratio $\phi$ is forced by self-similarity of that ledger (PhiForcing). Masses sit on a $\phi$-ladder relative to a yardstick.
This module sits in the Standard Model layer. It introduces the usual electroweak Higgs potential and the associated vacuum expectation value, then ties the Higgs configuration to the J-cost so that the physical vev can be read as a cost minimizer. Observed masses ($m_W$, $m_Z$, $m_H$, $v$) appear as named constants for comparison with the RS ladder.
Upstream material is thin: Constants supplies the RS time quantum; Cost supplies $J$; PhiForcing supplies the forced $\phi$. No full electroweak Lagrangian is reconstructed here.
proof idea
Primarily a definition module. It declares the Higgs potential, vev, mass parameters, and the J-cost of the Higgs field, then records a minimization statement that the physical vev minimizes that cost. No multi-step forcing chain or uniqueness argument is developed in-module; any nontrivial claim is a short algebraic or calculus check against the potential and $J$.
why it matters in Recognition Science
Gives the Standard Model electroweak breaking data a home inside the RS monolith so later mass-ladder and coupling work can cite a single vev and $W/Z$ ratio. Downstream use is not yet wired in the graph (no used_by edges). It does not itself force $D=3$, the eight-tick octave, or $\alpha$; those remain in the T0–T8 chain and related modules. The link of interest is whether the J-cost minimum recovers the observed vev scale on the $\phi$-ladder.
scope and limits
- Does not derive the Higgs potential from the Recognition Composition Law or T0–T8.
- Does not prove uniqueness of the electroweak vacuum beyond a local J-cost minimum claim.
- Does not compute running couplings or full one-loop electroweak precision observables.
- Does not force $m_W$, $m_Z$, or $m_H$ from $\phi$ alone without external yardstick input.
- Does not include Yukawa sector or fermion mass generation.
depends on (3)
declarations in this module (25)
-
def
higgsPotential -
def
vev -
def
vev_observed -
def
higgsMass -
def
higgsMass_observed -
def
wBosonMass -
def
zBosonMass -
def
wZRatio -
def
mW_observed -
def
mZ_observed -
def
jcostHiggs -
theorem
vev_minimizes_jcost -
theorem
symmetry_breaking_from_jcost -
theorem
vev_higgs_ratio -
theorem
vev_higgs_ratio_not_one -
theorem
hierarchy_problem -
theorem
rs_hierarchy -
def
goldstoneBosons -
theorem
photon_massless -
theorem
observed_wz_mass_hierarchy -
def
higgsDiscovery -
def
higgsFermionCoupling -
def
higgsGaugeCoupling -
def
summary -
structure
ElectroweakBreakingFalsifier