Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Verification.GWTC3RingdownOneMemberDampingStatistic

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Records the one-member QNM damping posterior summary for the GWTC-3 ringdown sample S190727h (DS_1mode_10M). Defines the RS damping target, sample mean/std/median/quantiles, residual and z-score from the mean, and the fraction of draws below target. Downstream family-scaling modules cite these constants. The content is structural bookkeeping of extracted HDF5 posterior numbers, not a deep derivation.

claimFor the single GWTC-3 ringdown member $S190727h$ (DS\_1mode\_10M), fix the RS damping target $\tau_{\mathrm{RS}}$ and the posterior summary statistics of the damping time: mean $\mu$, standard deviation $\sigma$, median, quantiles $q_{0.05}, q_{0.16}, q_{0.84}, q_{0.95}$, residual $\mu - \tau_{\mathrm{RS}}$, $z$-score $(\mu - \tau_{\mathrm{RS}})/\sigma$, fraction of posterior mass below $\tau_{\mathrm{RS}}$, and mean $f_\tau$.

background

Recognition Science verification against LIGO/Virgo GWTC-3 ringdown data proceeds by reading published HDF5 posterior samples for quasi-normal-mode (QNM) damping times and comparing them to an RS-native target. The upstream module GWTC3RingdownHDF5SampleSummary is a structural theorem (0 sorry) that records the first posterior-summary statistics extracted from a range-read GWTC-3 ringdown HDF5 file for member rin/rin_S190727h_pyring_DS_1mode_10M.h5.

This module specializes that sample to the one-member damping statistic. Sibling definitions name the RS damping target, the usual location/scale summaries (mean, std, median, outer and 1$\sigma$ quantiles), the residual and standardized residual of the mean from the target, the posterior fraction lying below the target, and the mean of the dimensionless damping factor $f_\tau$.

The local setting is pure verification bookkeeping: numerical constants frozen from the HDF5 draw, exposed as Lean definitions so later family and multi-event modules can cite them without re-parsing files.

proof idea

Definition and constant module, not a multi-step proof development. Values are pinned by the upstream HDF5 sample summary for S190727h DS_1mode_10M; this file packages the one-member damping view (target, moments, quantiles, residual, $z$, fraction below target, $f_\tau$ mean) as named Lean objects. Any one-statement theorem in the module is a thin wrapper asserting those recorded equalities, with no independent analytic argument.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Feeds the controlled-family scaling layer. Downstream GWTC3RingdownDS1Mode10MDampingFamily imports this module and records "the first controlled-family scaling of the Session 123 one-member QNM damping statistic." Without a frozen one-member baseline (target, mean residual, $z$, fraction below target), family comparisons across modes or events have no anchor.

In the broader RS verification domain this is empirical contact, not a forcing-chain step (T0–T8). It ties the abstract damping prediction to a concrete GWTC-3 ringdown posterior so later modules can state how far the data sit from the RS target and whether family structure tightens or loosens that tension.

scope and limits

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (1)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (23)