pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
lemma proved wrapper high

G_zero_of_unit

show as:
view Lean formalization →

The lemma shows that any cost function F normalized at unity has its log-reparametrized form G_F vanishing at the origin. Uniqueness proofs for the J-cost in the Recognition Science framework cite this when establishing normalization properties. The argument is a direct one-line wrapper applying the definition of G to the unit hypothesis.

claimIf $F : ℝ → ℝ$ satisfies $F(1) = 0$, then $G_F(0) = 0$, where $G_F(t) := F(e^t)$.

background

This lemma sits in the module of functional equation helpers for the T5 cost uniqueness proof. The central definition is the log-coordinate reparametrization $G_F(t) = F(ℝ.exp t)$. The module states that it supplies lemmas for the T5 cost uniqueness proof. Upstream constants supply the gravitational G and the explicit J-cost form $G(t) = cosh(t) - 1$ in log coordinates.

proof idea

The proof is a one-line wrapper that applies simpa using the definition of G to the hypothesis hUnit.

why it matters in Recognition Science

The lemma is invoked by normalized_implies_G_zero, washburn_uniqueness, washburn_uniqueness_aczel, T5_uniqueness_complete, and the full unconditional inevitability theorems. It supplies the basic normalization step inside the T5 J-uniqueness chain and the Recognition Science forcing sequence from T5 onward.

scope and limits

Lean usage

theorem normalized_implies_G_zero (F : ℝ → ℝ) (hNorm : IsNormalized F) : G F 0 = 0 := G_zero_of_unit F hNorm

formal statement (Lean)

  51lemma G_zero_of_unit (F : ℝ → ℝ) (hUnit : F 1 = 0) : G F 0 = 0 := by

proof body

One-line wrapper that applies simpa.

  52  simpa [G] using hUnit
  53

used by (6)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (7)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.