Pith. sign in
theorem

e_123323

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk06
domain
Gravity
line
268 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index tuple (1,2,3,3,2,3) on Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the explicit kernel value explicitZ. Gravity analysts certifying the 4D Regge midpoint M2TT identity cite this as one of the 256 concrete kernel cells. The proof is a single `decide` on integer arithmetic.

Claim. For indices $a{=}1,b{=}2,c{=}3,d{=}3,i{=}2,j{=}3$ in $\mathbb{F}_4$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit integer kernel: $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(1,2,3,3,2,3)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{expl}}(1,2,3,3,2,3)$.

background

This module is chunk 6 of a 256-cell kernel certification that the folded numerator of the 4D Regge midpoint M2TT identity equals eight times a closed-form integer table. Indices run over $\mathrm{Fin},4$ (four spacetime directions).

The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start at 0 and add each contribution term at those six indices. The explicit kernel $Z_{\mathrm{expl}}$ is a pattern-matched integer table on the same six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ arguments (sample values include $4$, $-2$, and so on).

The local claim is one concrete cell of the identity $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{expl}}$, discharged by kernel decision rather than by symbolic algebra on the fold.

proof idea

One-line proof by decide. Both sides reduce to concrete integers once the six Fin-4 indices are fixed: the left-hand side evaluates the fold of couplingZList contributions at $(1,2,3,3,2,3)$; the right-hand side looks up explicitZ at the same tuple and multiplies by 8. Lean’s decision procedure checks integer equality.

why it matters

Parent theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ assembles the full universal statement $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,, m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{expl}}$ by exhaustive fin_cases on all six indices; each leaf is one of these chunk cells. Without the cell-wise equalities, the assemble step has nothing to close on.

In the gravity analysis stack this certifies that the midpoint M2TT numerator in 4D Regge calculus matches the explicit kernel used downstream, a bookkeeping identity rather than a new dynamical law. It sits inside the broader RS gravity pipeline that feeds curvature and mass-ladder work, but does not itself invoke $\phi$, the eight-tick octave, or the forcing chain T0–T8.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.