Pith. sign in
theorem

e_203210

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk08
domain
Gravity
line
245 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index slot (2,0,3,2,1,0) on Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the closed-form kernel value explicitZ. Gravity analysts cite it when assembling the global identity m2Num = 8·explicitZ over the 4D Regge midpoint kernel. The proof is a single kernel decide on fixed concrete integers.

Claim. With indices in $\{0,1,2,3\}$, the folded coupling numerator at $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(2,0,3,2,1,0)$ equals eight times the explicit integer kernel at those same indices: $N(2,0,3,2,1,0)=8\,Z(2,0,3,2,1,0)$.

background

This module is one chunk of a 256-case kernel certification that the 4D Regge midpoint numerator equals eight times a tabulated integer kernel. Indices run over $\mathrm{Fin},4$, i.e. coordinate labels ${0,1,2,3}$ for a 4D simplex edge/face pattern.

The numerator $N=\texttt{m2Num}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start at 0 and add each local contribution $\texttt{contrib},t,a,b,c,d,i,j$. The closed form $Z=\texttt{explicitZ}$ is a pure pattern match on the six indices, returning small integers such as $4$, $-2$, and so on for the nonzero support.

The local claim is the single hex-tuple $(2,0,3,2,1,0)$ inside chunk 8 of that decide grid. Upstream only supplies the two definitions being compared; no analytic lemma is required beyond evaluation.

proof idea

One-line proof by decide. Both sides are closed integer expressions once the six Fin-4 indices are fixed: the left folds a finite coupling list of contributions, the right is a single match arm of the explicit kernel. Lean reduces both to concrete Int values and checks equality. No lemmas beyond the definitions of m2Num and explicitZ are invoked.

why it matters

Feeds the assembler m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,,N=8Z$ by exhaustive fin_cases over all six indices. Each chunk theorem such as this one discharges one concrete cell so the universal identity is a pure case split rather than a fresh computation.

In the gravity stack this identity is the algebraic backbone of the exact midpoint $M_2$ TT kernel in 4D Regge calculus: once $N=8Z$ is certified, curvature and mass-side comparisons can quote the compact kernel $Z$ instead of the folded sum. It is bookkeeping inside the Recognition gravity analysis, not a forcing-chain (T0–T8) step, but it hardens the discrete geometric side that later couples to continuum limits.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.