Pith. sign in
theorem

e_203310

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk08
domain
Gravity
line
261 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index slot (2,0,3,3,1,0) on Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the explicit kernel value explicitZ. Gravity analysts cite this as one atomic decide-cell in the 4D Regge midpoint M2TT identity. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. With indices in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the folded coupling numerator at $(2,0,3,3,1,0)$ equals eight times the tabulated explicit kernel entry at the same indices: $N(2,0,3,3,1,0)=8\,Z(2,0,3,3,1,0)$.

background

This module is chunk 8 of a 256-cell decide grid that certifies the algebraic identity $N=8Z$ pointwise on $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$. The setting is the exact midpoint analysis of the 4D Regge M2TT kernel used in the Recognition gravity stack.

The numerator $N=\mathrm{m2Num}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start from 0 and add each contribution $\mathrm{contrib},t,a,b,c,d,i,j$. The right-hand side $Z=\mathrm{explicitZ}$ is a sparse integer table on six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ indices (nonzero only on a short list of patterns such as $(0,0,1,1,2,2)\mapsto 4$ and several $-2$ off-diagonal slots).

The full quantified statement is assembled downstream by exhaustive fin_cases; each chunk theorem such as this one discharges one concrete sextuple.

proof idea

One-line decide proof. Both sides reduce to concrete Int values for the fixed indices $(2,0,3,3,1,0)$: the left by evaluating the fold of contrib over couplingZList, the right by looking up explicitZ (or the default 0 branch). Lean’s kernel decision procedure checks integer equality; no lemmas are invoked.

why it matters

Feeds the parent assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,,N=8Z$ by six nested fin_cases over $\mathrm{Fin},4$. That global identity is the certified numerator form of the Regge exact-midpoint M2TT relation in 4D, a computational pillar of the Recognition gravity analysis.

Within the framework this sits in the gravity domain rather than the T0–T8 forcing chain; it is infrastructure that keeps the discrete curvature/kernel bookkeeping exact before continuum or phenomenological limits are taken. Closing all 256 decide cells removes scaffolding risk from the M2 numerator identity.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.