Pith. sign in
theorem

e_313211

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk13
domain
Gravity
line
246 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

At multi-index (3,1,3,2,1,1), the folded Regge numerator equals eight times the explicit integer table value. Gravity analysts building the 4D midpoint M2TT identity cite this as one kernel case in chunk 13 of the exhaustive check. Proof is a single kernel `decide` on two concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(3,1,3,2,1,1)$ in $(\mathrm{Fin}\,4)^6$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit table entry: $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(3,1,3,2,1,1)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{expl}}(3,1,3,2,1,1)$.

background

In the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis, the numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is defined by folding a contribution map over a fixed coupling list, for six indices each ranging in $\mathrm{Fin},4$. The companion $Z_{\mathrm{expl}}$ is a piecewise integer function on the same index space, serving as the closed-form target (so the desired identity is $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{expl}}$ pointwise).

This module is chunk 13 of that pointwise verification: a battery of kernel decides covering one block of the $4^6$ index tuples. The local setting is pure integer equality after unfolding the fold and the table; no continuum geometry is invoked at this layer.

proof idea

One-line wrapper: both sides reduce to concrete Int values once the six indices are fixed, and decide discharges the equality in the kernel. No lemmas beyond the definitions of the numerator fold and the explicit table are required.

why it matters

Parent theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ assembles the full $\forall$-statement over $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$ by exhaustive fin_cases on the six indices; each concrete case lands on a chunk lemma of this form. That global identity is the algebraic backbone of the Regge midpoint M2TT analysis in 4D gravity inside the monolith. It does not itself touch the RS forcing chain (T0–T8), but it is infrastructure for the discrete gravity side that must eventually match continuum limits consistent with $D=3$ spatial dimensions and the eight-tick structure.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.