theorem
proved
tactic proof
alphaG_pred_lower
show as:
view Lean formalization →
formal statement (Lean)
149theorem alphaG_pred_lower : (4.5e9 : ℝ) < row_alphaG_pred := by
proof body
Tactic-mode proof.
150 have hφ : (1.618 : ℝ) < phi := by
151 simpa [show phi = (Real.goldenRatio : ℝ) from rfl] using phi_gt_1618
152 have hpiUB : (Real.pi : ℝ) < 3.142 := by
153 linarith [Real.pi_lt_d6, Real.pi_pos]
154 have hN :
155 (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * (1.618 : ℝ) ^ (112 : ℝ) < (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * phi ^ (112 : ℝ) := by
156 have hr112 : (1.618 : ℝ) ^ (112 : ℝ) < phi ^ (112 : ℝ) := by
157 exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow (by norm_num) hφ (by nlinarith)
158 nlinarith [hr112, zpow_pos (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < (2 : ℝ))]
159 have h0 : (4.5e9 : ℝ) * (3.142 : ℝ) < (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * (1.618 : ℝ) ^ (112 : ℝ) := by
160 -- conservative numeric bound (independent of the model)
161 nlinarith
162 have hltNum : (4.5e9 : ℝ) * Real.pi < (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * phi ^ (112 : ℝ) := by
163 nlinarith [h0, hN, hpiUB, Real.pi_pos]
164 have h1 : (4.5e9 : ℝ) < (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * phi ^ (112 : ℝ) / Real.pi := by
165 rw [lt_div_iff₀ Real.pi_pos]
166 simpa [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_comm] using hltNum
167 simpa [alphaG_pred_closed] using h1
168