theorem
proved
tactic proof
alphaG_pred_upper
show as:
view Lean formalization →
formal statement (Lean)
169theorem alphaG_pred_upper : row_alphaG_pred < (4.85e9 : ℝ) := by
proof body
Tactic-mode proof.
170 have hφ : phi < (1.6185 : ℝ) := by
171 simpa [show phi = (Real.goldenRatio : ℝ) from rfl] using phi_lt_16185
172 have hpiLB : (3.1415 : ℝ) < (Real.pi : ℝ) := by
173 linarith [Real.pi_gt_d6, Real.pi_pos]
174 have hN : (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * phi ^ (112 : ℝ) < (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * (1.6185 : ℝ) ^ (112 : ℝ) := by
175 have hr112 : (phi : ℝ) ^ (112 : ℝ) < (1.6185 : ℝ) ^ (112 : ℝ) := by
176 exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow (by nlinarith [phi_pos, hφ]) hφ (by nlinarith)
177 nlinarith [hr112, zpow_pos (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < (2 : ℝ))]
178 have h0 :
179 (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * (1.6185 : ℝ) ^ (112 : ℝ) < (4.85e9 : ℝ) * (3.1415 : ℝ) := by
180 nlinarith
181 have h1 : (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * phi ^ (112 : ℝ) / Real.pi < (4.85e9 : ℝ) := by
182 have hltNum : (2 : ℝ) ^ (-(44 : ℤ)) * phi ^ (112 : ℝ) < (4.85e9 : ℝ) * Real.pi := by
183 nlinarith [h0, hN, hpiLB, Real.pi_pos]
184 rw [div_lt_iff₀ Real.pi_pos]
185 simpa [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_comm] using hltNum
186 simpa [alphaG_pred_closed] using h1
187