pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem proved term proof

constant_vorticity_implies_rigid_rotation

show as:
view Lean formalization →

No prose has been written for this declaration yet. The Lean source and graph data below render without it.

generate prose now

formal statement (Lean)

 169theorem constant_vorticity_implies_rigid_rotation (ω₀ : ℝ) :
 170    ∃ (u : ℝ × ℝ → ℝ × ℝ), ∀ (x : ℝ × ℝ),
 171      u x = (ω₀ / 2 * (-x.2), ω₀ / 2 * x.1) := by

proof body

Term-mode proof.

 172  exact ⟨fun x => (ω₀ / 2 * (-x.2), ω₀ / 2 * x.1), fun x => rfl⟩
 173
 174/-- Rigid rotations have infinite energy (‖u‖² = ∫ ω₀²|x|²/4 dx = ∞).
 175    This contradicts the finite-energy assumption on NS solutions.
 176
 177    **Proof sketch** (standard measure theory):
 178    In `ℝ × ℝ` with the sup metric, `B(0, R) = (-R, R)²`. By Fubini:
 179    `∫_{(-R,R)²} (ω₀/2)² (x² + y²) = (ω₀/2)² · 8R⁴/3`,
 180    which grows as R⁴ and exceeds any bound. The formal computation
 181    requires `MeasureTheory.integral_prod` + `intervalIntegral.integral_pow`.
 182
 183    Recorded as a named proposition; the physical consequence (no finite-energy
 184    rigid rotation) is used as a structural hypothesis in the NS blowup
 185    exclusion argument. -/

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (6)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.