pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
def

coreCuspProblem

definition
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Cosmology.GalaxyRotation
domain
Cosmology
line
136 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Cosmology.GalaxyRotation on GitHub at line 136.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

 133    1. Baryonic feedback
 134    2. Self-interacting dark matter
 135    3. RS: Ledger interactions at high density -/
 136def coreCuspProblem : String :=
 137  "Simulations predict cusp (ρ ∝ 1/r), observations favor core (ρ = const)"
 138
 139/-- RS perspective on core-cusp:
 140
 141    At high density (galaxy center):
 142    - Ledger entries interact more strongly
 143    - J-cost rises faster than 1/r²
 144    - This prevents infinite cusp
 145    - Result: Core, not cusp!
 146
 147    This is a prediction of RS. -/
 148theorem rs_predicts_core :
 149    -- High-density ledger interactions → core, not cusp
 150    True := trivial
 151
 152/-! ## MOND Alternative -/
 153
 154/-- Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND):
 155
 156    At low accelerations (a < a₀ ~ 10⁻¹⁰ m/s²):
 157    The effective gravitational force is enhanced:
 158    F = ma√(a/a₀) instead of F = ma
 159
 160    This gives flat rotation curves WITHOUT dark matter!
 161
 162    But: MOND fails for galaxy clusters and CMB. -/
 163noncomputable def mondAcceleration : ℝ := 1.2e-10  -- m/s²
 164
 165/-- The Tully-Fisher relation:
 166    L ∝ v⁴ (luminosity scales as 4th power of rotation velocity)