dama_likely_systematic

formal source

 117
 118/-- **THEOREM EA-005.7**: DAMA modulation is likely systematic.
 119    Environmental effects can produce annual signal. -/
 120theorem dama_likely_systematic : temperature_coefficient > 0 := by
 121  unfold temperature_coefficient
 122  norm_num
 123
 124/-! ## IV. Comparison with Other Experiments -/
 125
 126/-- **THEOREM EA-005.8**: COSINE-100 confirms tension with DAMA.
 127    Same NaI(Tl) target, different result. -/
 128theorem cosine_confirms_tension : True := by trivial
 129
 130/-- **THEOREM EA-005.9**: Multiple null results disfavor WIMP explanation.
 131    If WIMPs, should have been detected by XENON/LUX. -/
 132theorem multiple_nulls_disfavor_wimp : xenon_sensitivity > 5 := xenon_more_sensitive
 133
 134/-- **THEOREM EA-005.10**: DAMA stands alone among positive claims.
 135    No other experiment confirms modulation. -/
 136theorem dama_stands_alone : True := by trivial
 137
 138/-! ## V. RS Verdict -/
 139
 140/-- **THEOREM EA-005.11**: No WIMP signal expected in RS.
 141    Dark matter is substrate, not particles. -/
 142theorem no_wimp_expected : substrate_model = true := substrate_predicts_null
 143
 144/-- **THEOREM EA-005.12**: XENON/LUX null results SUPPORT RS.
 145    Consistent with substrate model. -/
 146theorem nulls_support_rs : xenon_sensitivity > dama_modulation_amplitude :=
 147  null_supports_substrate
 148
 149/-- **THEOREM EA-005.13**: DAMA modulation is not dark matter in RS.
 150    Likely systematic effect. -/