theorem
proved
law_of_existence
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.CostAxioms on GitHub at line 232.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
used by
formal source
229def Exists (x : ℝ) : Prop := 0 < x ∧ J x = 0
230
231/-- The Law of Existence: x exists ⟺ x = 1. -/
232theorem law_of_existence {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : Exists x ↔ x = 1 := by
233 simp only [Exists, J_eq_zero_iff hx, and_iff_right hx]
234
235/-- Unity is the unique existent. -/
236theorem unity_is_unique_existent : ∀ x : ℝ, Exists x ↔ x = 1 := by
237 intro x
238 by_cases hx : 0 < x
239 · exact law_of_existence hx
240 · simp only [Exists]
241 constructor
242 · intro ⟨hpos, _⟩; exact absurd hpos hx
243 · intro heq; subst heq; exact ⟨one_pos, by simp [J]⟩
244
245/-! ## Deriving MP from Cost -/
246
247/-- **Meta-Principle (Derived)**: "Nothing cannot recognize itself."
248
249In the cost framework, "Nothing" corresponds to the limit x → 0.
250Recognition requires a finite cost, but J(0) → ∞, so recognition
251of "Nothing" by "Nothing" would require infinite cost—impossible.
252
253This makes MP a **derived theorem**, not a primitive axiom. -/
254theorem mp_from_cost :
255 ∀ M : ℝ, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ x, 0 < x → x < ε → J x > M := by
256 exact J_arbitrarily_large_near_zero
257
258/-- Alternative formulation: No finite-cost state can approach Nothing. -/
259theorem nothing_costs_infinity :
260 ¬∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x, 0 < x → J x ≤ C := by
261 push_neg
262 intro C