pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem

rg_derivation_of_central_potentials

proved
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Papers.DraftV1
domain
Papers
line
267 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Papers.DraftV1 on GitHub at line 267.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

 264Status: not yet formalized (Laplacian / Green's functions). -/
 265def CentralPotentialDerivationHypothesis : Prop := True
 266
 267theorem rg_derivation_of_central_potentials (_h : CentralPotentialDerivationHypothesis) : True := trivial
 268
 269/-- Placeholder for the paper proposition ``Robustness of D=3 Signature''.
 270
 271Status: not yet formalized (perturbation theory / IFT / continuity). -/
 272def RobustnessHypothesis : Prop := True
 273
 274theorem robustness_of_D3_signature (_h : RobustnessHypothesis) : True := trivial
 275
 276/-- The (T) setup assumptions required for Alexander duality in the paper
 277are satisfied for this dimension. Now delegates to the cohomology-based
 278`SphereAdmitsCircleLinking` rather than being vacuous. -/
 279def AlexanderDualityApplies (D : ℕ) : Prop :=
 280  AlexanderDualityForCircleHypothesis D
 281
 282/-- Paper proposition (T): Linking selection principle.
 283
 284Previously an explicit hypothesis interface; now the bridge from
 285linking to D = 3 is provided by `alexander_duality_circle_linking`. -/
 286def LinkingSelectionPrincipleHypothesis (D : ℕ) : Prop :=
 287  LinkingInvariantHypothesis D → D = 3
 288
 289theorem linking_selection_principle (D : ℕ)
 290    (h : LinkingSelectionPrincipleHypothesis D) (hLink : LinkingInvariantHypothesis D) :
 291    D = 3 :=
 292  h hLink
 293
 294/-- Paper main theorem (forward direction): if (T), (K), (S) hold then `D=3`.
 295
 296In the current repo, (S) and (K) are fully formalized at the arithmetic/algebraic level;
 297(T) is recorded but not used in the proof here. -/