pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem

pattern_to_nat_bound

proved
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.Patterns.GrayCodeAxioms
domain
Patterns
line
127 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.Patterns.GrayCodeAxioms on GitHub at line 127.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

used by

formal source

 124
 125**Status**: Straightforward calculation
 126-/
 127theorem pattern_to_nat_bound :
 128  ∀ (d : ℕ) (p : Pattern d),
 129    (∑ k : Fin d, if p k then 2^(k.val) else 0) < 2^d :=
 130  GrayCodeFacts.pattern_to_nat_bound
 131
 132/-- **Classical Result**: Consecutive Gray codes differ in one bit.
 133
 134For any n < 2^d - 1, gray(n) and gray(n+1) differ in exactly one bit position.
 135
 136**Proof**:
 137- gray(n) XOR gray(n+1) = [n XOR (n>>1)] XOR [(n+1) XOR ((n+1)>>1)]
 138- This simplifies to a single power of 2 (bit at position of least significant 0 in n)
 139
 140**References**:
 141- Savage (1997), Theorem 2.1
 142- Knuth (2011), Theorem 7.2.1.1.A
 143
 144**Status**: Defining property of Gray codes
 145-/
 146theorem gray_code_one_bit_property :
 147  ∀ (d n : ℕ), n + 1 < 2^d →
 148    ∃! k : ℕ, k < d ∧
 149      (n ^^^ (n >>> 1)).testBit k ≠ ((n+1) ^^^ ((n+1) >>> 1)).testBit k :=
 150  GrayCodeFacts.gray_code_one_bit_property
 151
 152end GrayCodeAxioms
 153end Patterns
 154end IndisputableMonolith