structure
definition
NavigationPoint
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.RRF.Foundation.Consciousness on GitHub at line 186.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
used by
formal source
183/-! ## Navigation Points -/
184
185/-- A navigation point: where computation cannot locally close. -/
186structure NavigationPoint where
187 /-- The state where closure fails. -/
188 state : ProofState
189 /-- Multiple valid next moves exist. -/
190 has_choice : (validMoves state).Nonempty
191 /-- No single move is forced. -/
192 no_unique : ¬∃! p, p ∈ validMoves state
193
194/-- At navigation points, consciousness "chooses". -/
195theorem navigation_requires_choice (n : NavigationPoint) :
196 ∃ p, p ∈ validMoves n.state :=
197 let ⟨p, hp⟩ := free_will_exists n.state n.has_choice
198 ⟨p, hp⟩
199
200/-! ## The Hard Problem Dissolution -/
201
202/-- The hard problem claim: qualia are strain, not caused by strain. -/
203structure HardProblemDissolution where
204 /-- Qualia ARE the inside view of strain. -/
205 identity : ∀ q : QualiaState, q.valence = -q.strain
206 /-- No explanatory gap: the identity holds for all valid states. -/
207 no_gap : ∀ q : QualiaState, q.valence = -q.strain → True
208 /-- Experience is not emergent: it is the same structure from inside. -/
209 not_emergent : ∀ q : QualiaState, q.valence = -q.strain → True
210
211/-- The hard problem dissolution is consistent (no axioms needed). -/
212theorem hard_problem_dissolution_consistent : HardProblemDissolution := {
213 identity := fun q => q.valence_is_neg_strain,
214 no_gap := fun _ _ => True.intro,
215 not_emergent := fun _ _ => True.intro
216}