`composition_status`

definition

show as: view math explainer →

module: IndisputableMonolith.RecogGeom.Composition
domain: RecogGeom
line: 204 · github
papers citing: none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.RecogGeom.Composition on GitHub at line 204.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

formal source

 201
 202/-! ## Module Status -/
 203
 204def composition_status : String :=
 205  "✓ CompositeRecognizer defined (RG6)\n" ++
 206  "✓ composite_indistinguishable_iff: c₁ ~₁₂ c₂ ↔ (c₁ ~₁ c₂) ∧ (c₁ ~₂ c₂)\n" ++
 207  "✓ composite_refines_left/right: composite refines both components\n" ++
 208  "✓ composite_resolutionCell: cells are intersections\n" ++
 209  "✓ quotientMapLeft/Right: surjective quotient maps\n" ++
 210  "✓ REFINEMENT THEOREM: composite quotient refines both components\n" ++
 211  "✓ composite_comm: composition is commutative\n" ++
 212  "✓ Information monotonicity theorems\n" ++
 213  "\n" ++
 214  "COMPOSITION (RG6) COMPLETE"
 215
 216#eval composition_status
 217
 218end RecogGeom
 219end IndisputableMonolith

papers checked against this theorem

No papers in the current corpus map onto this theorem yet.