pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem

separating_singleton_cells

proved
show as:
view math explainer →
module
IndisputableMonolith.RecogGeom.Dimension
domain
RecogGeom
line
66 · github
papers citing
none yet

open explainer

Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.

open lean source

IndisputableMonolith.RecogGeom.Dimension on GitHub at line 66.

browse module

All declarations in this module, on Recognition.

explainer page

Tracked in the explainer inventory; generation is lazy so crawlers do not trigger LLM jobs.

open explainer

depends on

used by

formal source

  63    exact hc
  64
  65/-- If a recognizer separates, every resolution cell is a singleton. -/
  66theorem separating_singleton_cells (r : Recognizer C E) (h : IsSeparating r) (c : C) :
  67    ResolutionCell r c = {c} := by
  68  ext x
  69  simp only [ResolutionCell, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
  70  constructor
  71  · intro hx; exact h hx
  72  · intro hx; subst hx; rfl
  73
  74/-! ## Two-Recognizer Separation -/
  75
  76/-- Two recognizers together separate if their composite distinguishes all configs. -/
  77def PairSeparates {E₁ E₂ : Type*} [EventSpace E₁] [EventSpace E₂]
  78    (r₁ : Recognizer C E₁) (r₂ : Recognizer C E₂) : Prop :=
  79  IsSeparating (r₁ ⊗ r₂)
  80
  81/-- Pair separation is equivalent to: same (e₁, e₂) implies same config. -/
  82theorem pairSeparates_iff {E₁ E₂ : Type*} [EventSpace E₁] [EventSpace E₂]
  83    (r₁ : Recognizer C E₁) (r₂ : Recognizer C E₂) :
  84    PairSeparates r₁ r₂ ↔
  85      ∀ c₁ c₂, (r₁.R c₁ = r₁.R c₂ ∧ r₂.R c₁ = r₂.R c₂) → c₁ = c₂ := by
  86  simp only [PairSeparates, IsSeparating, Function.Injective, composite_R_eq,
  87             Prod.mk.injEq]
  88
  89/-! ## Independence -/
  90
  91/-- Two recognizers are **independent** if each provides information the other doesn't.
  92    This means: ∃ configs distinguished by r₁ but not r₂, and vice versa. -/
  93def IndependentRecognizers {E₁ E₂ : Type*} [EventSpace E₁] [EventSpace E₂]
  94    (r₁ : Recognizer C E₁) (r₂ : Recognizer C E₂) : Prop :=
  95  (∃ c₁ c₂, r₁.R c₁ ≠ r₁.R c₂ ∧ r₂.R c₁ = r₂.R c₂) ∧
  96  (∃ c₁ c₂, r₁.R c₁ = r₁.R c₂ ∧ r₂.R c₁ ≠ r₂.R c₂)