lemma
proved
mul
show as:
view math explainer →
open explainer
Generate a durable explainer page for this declaration.
open lean source
IndisputableMonolith.RecogSpec.Core on GitHub at line 85.
browse module
All declarations in this module, on Recognition.
explainer page
depends on
used by
-
shiftedComposeH_val -
shiftedCompose_val -
J_at_phi -
PhiInt -
canonicalPhiRingObj -
PhiRingHom -
PhiRingObj -
divConstraint_continuous -
duhamelKernelDominatedConvergenceAt_of_forcing -
DimensionedQuantity -
dAlembert_contDiff_top -
dAlembert_contDiff_top -
dAlembert_first_deriv_of_contDiff -
dAlembert_second_deriv_at_zero_of_contDiff -
dAlembert_continuous_of_log_curvature -
deriv_neg_self_zero -
deriv_pos_self_zero -
tendsto_H_one_of_log_curvature -
Jcost_continuous_pos -
hasDerivAt_costAlphaLog_first -
mul -
mul_def -
toComplex_mul -
hasDerivAt_costAlphaLog -
log_bilinear_affine_lift_classification -
mul -
add_mul' -
mul -
response_limit_high_freq -
solution_exists -
G_ratio_continuous_snd -
ode_neg_energy_constant -
coerciveL2Bound_of_tailFluxVanish -
bet1_boundaryTerm_integrable_of_L2_mul_r -
rm2Closed_of_coerciveL2Bound -
ancientDecay_implies_Aprime2r2_integrable -
operatorPairing_of_decayFull -
hasDerivAt_rsq_mul -
zeroSkewAtInfinity_of_integrable -
zpow_phase_charge
formal source
82lemma neg (hx : PhiClosed φ x) : PhiClosed φ (-x) :=
83 (phiSubfield φ).neg_mem hx
84
85lemma mul (hx : PhiClosed φ x) (hy : PhiClosed φ y) :
86 PhiClosed φ (x * y) :=
87 (phiSubfield φ).mul_mem hx hy
88
89lemma inv (hx : PhiClosed φ x) : PhiClosed φ x⁻¹ :=
90 (phiSubfield φ).inv_mem hx
91
92lemma div (hx : PhiClosed φ x) (hy : PhiClosed φ y) :
93 PhiClosed φ (x / y) :=
94 (phiSubfield φ).div_mem hx hy
95
96lemma pow (hx : PhiClosed φ x) (n : ℕ) : PhiClosed φ (x ^ n) := by
97 simpa using (phiSubfield φ).pow_mem hx n
98
99lemma pow_self (φ : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : PhiClosed φ (φ ^ n) :=
100 pow (self φ) n
101
102lemma inv_self (φ : ℝ) : PhiClosed φ (φ⁻¹) :=
103 inv (self φ)
104
105lemma inv_pow_self (φ : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : PhiClosed φ ((φ ^ n)⁻¹) :=
106 inv (pow_self φ n)
107
108lemma of_nat (φ : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : PhiClosed φ (n : ℝ) := by
109 simpa using of_rat φ n
110
111lemma half (φ : ℝ) : PhiClosed φ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
112 have htwo : PhiClosed φ ((2 : ℚ) : ℝ) := of_rat φ 2
113 simpa using inv htwo
114
115end PhiClosed