Recognition: unknown
A fitting formula for the merger timescale of galaxies in hierarchical clustering
read the original abstract
We study galaxy mergers using a high-resolution cosmological hydro/N-body simulation with star formation, and compare the measured merger timescales with theoretical predictions based on the Chandrasekhar formula. In contrast to Navarro et al., our numerical results indicate, that the commonly used equation for the merger timescale given by Lacey and Cole, systematically underestimates the merger timescales for minor mergers and overestimates those for major mergers. This behavior is partly explained by the poor performance of their expression for the Coulomb logarithm, \ln (m_pri/m_sat). The two alternative forms \ln (1+m_pri/m_sat) and 1/2\ln [1+(m_pri/m_sat)^2] for the Coulomb logarithm can account for the mass dependence of merger timescale successfully, but both of them underestimate the merger time scale by a factor 2. Since \ln (1+m_pri/m_sat) represents the mass dependence slightly better we adopt this expression for the Coulomb logarithm. Furthermore, we find that the dependence of the merger timescale on the circularity parameter \epsilon is much weaker than the widely adopted power-law \epsilon^{0.78}, whereas 0.94*{\epsilon}^{0.60}+0.60 provides a good match to the data. Based on these findings, we present an accurate and convenient fitting formula for the merger timescale of galaxies in cold dark matter models.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Broken Similarity: Sinking and Merging of Dark Matter Subhalos Across Hierarchical Levels
In LambdaCDM simulations, over 90% of subhalo sinking events occur between adjacent hierarchy levels, satellite-satellite mergers can rival central-satellite rates at low masses, and the overall merger landscape devia...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.