Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An efficient reduction of ranking to classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0710.2889 v2 pith:22PSYZ3E submitted 2007-10-15 cs.LG cs.IR

classification cs.LGcs.IR
keywords reductionrankingalgorithmbinaryclassificationguaranteesapplicationsclassifier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper describes an efficient reduction of the learning problem of ranking to binary classification. The reduction guarantees an average pairwise misranking regret of at most that of the binary classifier regret, improving a recent result of Balcan et al which only guarantees a factor of 2. Moreover, our reduction applies to a broader class of ranking loss functions, admits a simpler proof, and the expected running time complexity of our algorithm in terms of number of calls to a classifier or preference function is improved from $\Omega(n^2)$ to $O(n \log n)$. In addition, when the top $k$ ranked elements only are required ($k \ll n$), as in many applications in information extraction or search engines, the time complexity of our algorithm can be further reduced to $O(k \log k + n)$. Our reduction and algorithm are thus practical for realistic applications where the number of points to rank exceeds several thousands. Much of our results also extend beyond the bipartite case previously studied. Our rediction is a randomized one. To complement our result, we also derive lower bounds on any deterministic reduction from binary (preference) classification to ranking, implying that our use of a randomized reduction is essentially necessary for the guarantees we provide.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Explanations Improve Recommendations? Evidence from Prediction-Informed Explanations

    cs.IR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    RecPIE jointly optimizes recommendation predictions and LLM-generated natural-language explanations via alternating training and reinforcement learning, yielding 3-4% accuracy gains and higher human preference on Goog...

  2. Prioritizing App Reviews for Developer Responses on Google Play

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    XGBoost best predicts whether a Google Play review received a developer response and whether the response came within three days, but 'needs response' is defined by developer behavior, not by review value.

Pith tools