REVIEW 1 cited by
Einstein's Theory of Gravity and the Problem of Missing Mass
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Einstein's Theory of Gravity and the Problem of Missing Mass
read the original abstract
The observed matter in the universe accounts for just 5 percent of the observed gravity. A possible explanation is that Newton's and Einstein's theories of gravity fail where gravity is either weak or enhanced. The modified theory of Newtonian dynamics (MOND) reproduces, without dark matter, spiral-galaxy orbital motions and the relation between luminosity and rotation in galaxies, although not in clusters. Recent extensions of Einstein's theory are theoretically more complete. They inevitably include dark fields that seed structure growth, and they may explain recent weak lensing data. However, the presence of dark fields reduces calculability and comes at the expense of the original MOND premise -- that the matter we see is the sole source of gravity. Observational tests of the relic radiation, weak lensing, and the growth of structure may distinguish modified gravity from dark matter.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Galactic dark matter halos: From anisotropic fluids in general relativity to Horava-Lifshitz gravity
A GR Hamiltonian deformation produces an anisotropic fluid that cannot flatten rotation curves, while Horava-Lifshitz produces the right dark-matter scaling only for an imposed power-law LTB ansatz with tight paramete...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.