pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1201.6192 · v2 · submitted 2012-01-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Do Observations Favour Galileon Over Quintessence?

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords fieldgalileonquintessencemodeldatascalarstandarduniverse
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study the Galileon scalar field model arising as a decoupling limit of the Dvali-Gababdaze-Porrati (DGP) construction for the late time acceleration of the universe. The model has one extra Galileon correction term over and above the standard kinetic and potential energy terms for a canonical quintessence field. We aim to study whether the current observational data can distinguish between this Galileon field and the quintessence field. Our study shows the remarkable result that for potentials like linear, square or exponential, the data prefers the Galileon model over quintessence field. It confirms that the observable universe demands the inclusion of higher derivative Galileon corrections in the standard quintessence scalar field models.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Galileon versus Quintessence: A comparative phase space analysis and late-time cosmic relevance

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Light-mass Galileon models with cubic interactions and three tested potentials have no stable late-time accelerating attractors in phase space, unlike quintessence which has stable de-Sitter attractors for cosh potentials.