Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Word Representations via Gaussian Embedding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1412.6623 v4 pith:TO4YV5GI submitted 2014-12-20 cs.CL cs.LG

Luke Vilnis , Andrew McCallum This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords representationsworddistributedembeddingembeddingsgaussianrelationshipsrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current work in lexical distributed representations maps each word to a point vector in low-dimensional space. Mapping instead to a density provides many interesting advantages, including better capturing uncertainty about a representation and its relationships, expressing asymmetries more naturally than dot product or cosine similarity, and enabling more expressive parameterization of decision boundaries. This paper advocates for density-based distributed embeddings and presents a method for learning representations in the space of Gaussian distributions. We compare performance on various word embedding benchmarks, investigate the ability of these embeddings to model entailment and other asymmetric relationships, and explore novel properties of the representation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GRE-Diff: Gaussian Room Embeddings for Structured Layout Diffusion

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modeling rooms as isotropic Gaussians and using them to initialize and guide diffusion yields controllable, editable polygonal floor plans that beat prior methods on RPLAN similarity and constraint metrics.

  2. Learning Probabilistic Embeddings for Unsupervised Action Segmentation

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Probabilistic Gaussian frame embeddings sampled before OT pseudo-labeling raise unsupervised action-segmentation MoF by up to 20.7% and F1 by 19% over deterministic baselines.

  3. TaxoBell: Gaussian Box Embeddings for Self-Supervised Taxonomy Expansion

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TaxoBell, a Gaussian-box embedding model with symmetric and asymmetric energy losses, ranks parent concepts more accurately than seven taxonomy-expansion baselines on five benchmarks.

  4. Native Hierarchical and Compositional Representations with Subspace Embeddings

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Concepts are embedded as learned linear subspaces, so entailment becomes subspace inclusion and logical operations become intersection, sum, and orthogonal complement; the method claims SOTA on WordNet and surpasses b...

  5. Confidence Optimization for Probabilistic Encoding

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A confidence-aware loss plus a negative L2 variance term gives a small boost to probabilistic encoding classifiers on TweetEval, but gains over the SPC baseline are modest and inconsistent on RoBERTa.

Pith tools