Recognition: unknown
Can NRQCD explain the γγ^* to η_c transition form factor data?
read the original abstract
Unlike the bewildering situation in the $\gamma\gamma^*\to \pi$ form factor, a widespread view is that perturbative QCD can decently account for the recent \textsc{BaBar} measurement of $\gamma\gamma^*\to \eta_c$ transition form factor. The next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) perturbative correction to the $\gamma\gamma^*\to \eta_{c,b}$ form factor, is investigated in the NRQCD factorization framework for the first time. As a byproduct, we obtain by far the most precise order-$\alpha_s^2$ NRQCD matching coefficient for the $\eta_{c,b}\to \gamma\gamma$ process. After including the substantial negative order-$\alpha_s^2$ correction, the good agreement between NRQCD prediction and the measured $\gamma\gamma^*\to \eta_c$ form factor is completely ruined over a wide range of momentum transfer squared. This eminent discrepancy casts some doubts on the applicability of NRQCD approach to hard exclusive reactions involving charmonium.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Radiative charmonium decays in a contact-interaction model with dynamical quark anomalous magnetic moment
Contact-interaction model with dynamical quark anomalous magnetic moment reproduces lattice QCD results for eta_c to gamma gamma and J/psi to gamma eta_c decays, consistent with 2026 data but not the 2024 measurement.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.