REVIEW 4 cited by
A new method to assign galaxy cluster membership using photometric redshifts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A new method to assign galaxy cluster membership using photometric redshifts
read the original abstract
We introduce a new effective strategy to assign group and cluster membership probabilities $P_{mem}$ to galaxies using photometric redshift information. Large dynamical ranges both in halo mass and cosmic time are considered. The method takes the magnitude distribution of both cluster and field galaxies as well as the radial distribution of galaxies in clusters into account using a non-parametric formalism and relies on Bayesian inference to take photometric redshift uncertainties into account. We successfully test the method against 1,208 galaxy clusters within redshifts $z=0.05-2.58$ and masses $10^{13.29-14.80}~M_\odot$ drawn from wide field simulated galaxy mock catalogs developed for the Euclid mission. Median purity $(55^{+17}_{-15})\%$ and completeness $(95^{+5}_{-10})\%$ are reached for galaxies brighter than 0.25$L_\ast$ within $r_{200}$ of each simulated halo and for a statistical photometric redshift accuracy $\sigma((z_s-z_p)/(1+z_s))=0.03$. The mean values $p=56\%$ and $c=93\%$ have sub-percent uncertainties. Accurate photometric redshifts ($\sigma((z_s-z_p)/(1+z_s))\lesssim0.05$) and robust estimates for the cluster redshift and the center coordinates are required. The method is applied to derive accurate richness estimates. A statistical comparison between the true ($N_{\rm true}$) vs estimated richness ($\lambda=\sum P_{mem}$) yields on average to unbiased results, $Log(\lambda/N_{\rm true})=-0.0051\pm0.15$. The scatter around the mean of the logarithmic difference between $\lambda$ and the halo mass is 0.10~dex, for massive halos $\gtrsim10^{14.5}~M_\odot$. Our estimates could be useful to calibrate independent cluster mass estimates from weak lensing, SZ, and X-ray studies. Our method can be applied to any list of galaxy clusters or groups in both present and forthcoming surveys such as SDSS, CFHTLS, DES, LSST, and Euclid.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Hierarchical assembly in action: a galaxy tail from a disrupting group in the Virgo cluster outskirts
The W cloud is reinterpreted as a disrupting galaxy group with a dynamically coherent tidal tail delivering low-mass star-forming dwarfs to the Virgo cluster.
-
S-PLUS Clusters And Large-scale Environments (SCALE): II. PZWav versus redMaPPer identification of eRosita groups
A probabilistic Hausdorff-distance matching of PZWav/AME optical systems to eRASS1 X-ray contours yields multi-wavelength group/cluster catalogs with tunable purity and improved low-mass completeness versus redMaPPer.
-
S-PLUS Clusters And Large-scale Environments (SCALE): I. A catalog of known clusters and groups in DR5 and a pilot study of Abell 4038
SCALE delivers dynamical properties for 83 known z≤0.1 systems and uses S-PLUS photo-zs plus RPM to map Abell 4038 substructure and mass-dependent color-concentration trends.
-
Galaxy clusters in the VIDEO fields: detection and characterisation in the context of MOONRISE
Reports a catalog of 519 cluster candidates (74 at z>1.5) from VIDEO fields via AMICO and WaZP, shows red-sequence galaxies consistent with passive evolution since high redshift, and evaluates MOONRISE detection strat...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.