Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

An unexpected unity among methods for interpreting model predictions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.07478 v3 pith:4Q3I55PD submitted 2016-11-22 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords modelpredictionsmethodsrepresentationaccuracyadditivecomplexfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding why a model made a certain prediction is crucial in many data science fields. Interpretable predictions engender appropriate trust and provide insight into how the model may be improved. However, with large modern datasets the best accuracy is often achieved by complex models even experts struggle to interpret, which creates a tension between accuracy and interpretability. Recently, several methods have been proposed for interpreting predictions from complex models by estimating the importance of input features. Here, we present how a model-agnostic additive representation of the importance of input features unifies current methods. This representation is optimal, in the sense that it is the only set of additive values that satisfies important properties. We show how we can leverage these properties to create novel visual explanations of model predictions. The thread of unity that this representation weaves through the literature indicates that there are common principles to be learned about the interpretation of model predictions that apply in many scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 104 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Optimizing for Interpretability in Deep Neural Networks with Tree Regularization

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tree regularization, which penalizes the decision path length of a tree fitted to a deep network's predictions, produces deep models with higher accuracy at low complexity than L1 or L2 penalties.

  2. Global Aggregations of Local Explanations for Black Box models

    cs.IR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GALE aggregates local explanations to reveal global model behavior, showing that LIME's global importance measure is unreliable while the proposed aggregations better capture how features affect predictions.

  3. Wavelet Scattering Transform for Interpretable Schizophrenia Biomarker Discovery and Classification from Resting-State EEG

    eess.SP 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single sentence stating the discovery directly. ≤ 300 chars.

  4. Parkinson's Disease Recognition Using SPECT Image and Interpretable AI: A Tutorial

    eess.IV 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Guided backpropagation gives the most accurate fine-grained localizations, and SHAP gives the most discriminative heatmaps at the dopamine-depletion site, among six interpretation methods applied to SPECT-based Parkin...

  5. AI-Augmented LLMs Achieve Therapist-Level Responses in Motivational Interviewing

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A custom prompt built from machine-learning-identified therapy behavior features improved GPT-4's motivational interviewing quality scores, though the model remained slightly below human therapists on the paper's own metric.

Pith tools