pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1701.01789 · v2 · submitted 2017-01-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

Median statistics estimates of Hubble and Newton's Constant

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM
keywords medianstatisticsconstantestimatesassumptionscorrespondingdatadifferent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Robustness of any statistics depends upon the number of assumptions it makes about the measured data. We point out the advantages of median statistics using toy numerical experiments and demonstrate its robustness, when the number of assumptions we can make about the data are limited. We then apply the median statistics technique to obtain estimates of two constants of nature, Hubble Constant ($H_0$) and Newton's Gravitational Constant($G$), both of which show significant differences between different measurements. For $H_0$, we update the analysis done by Chen and Ratra (2011) and Gott et al. (2001) using $576$ measurements. We find after grouping the different results according to their primary type of measurement, the median estimates are given by $H_0=72.5^{+2.5}_{-8}$ km/sec/Mpc with errors corresponding to 95% c.l. (2$\sigma$) and $G=6.674702^{+0.0014}_{-0.0009} \times 10^{-11} \mathrm{N m^{2}kg^{-2}}$ corresponding to 68% c.l. (1$\sigma$).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing cosmic anisotropy with galaxy clusters and supernovae

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Analysis of galaxy cluster and supernova data reveals a ~2σ directional variation in the Hubble constant, robust across calibration methods and aligned with the CMB dipole.