REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum state certification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantum state certification
read the original abstract
We consider the problem of quantum state certification, where one is given $n$ copies of an unknown $d$-dimensional quantum mixed state $\rho$, and one wants to test whether $\rho$ is equal to some known mixed state $\sigma$ or else is $\epsilon$-far from $\sigma$. The goal is to use notably fewer copies than the $\Omega(d^2)$ needed for full tomography on $\rho$ (i.e., density estimation). We give two robust state certification algorithms: one with respect to fidelity using $n = O(d/\epsilon)$ copies, and one with respect to trace distance using $n = O(d/\epsilon^2)$ copies. The latter algorithm also applies when $\sigma$ is unknown as well. These copy complexities are optimal up to constant factors.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On estimating operator norm distance, with optimal trace distance estimation when one state is pure
Rank-independent quantum estimators achieve Θ(1/ε) queries for operator-norm (and trace) distance when one state is pure, and Õ(1/ε^{3/2}) queries for general states, proving BQP-completeness.
-
Robust Statistical Estimators with Bounded Empirical Sensitivity
Defines empirical sensitivity and proves Ω(η + √(η d/n)) lower bound (tight up to logs) for any Gaussian mean estimator achieving optimal O(√(d/n)) ℓ₂ error.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.