Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Automatic Detection of Fake News

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.07104 v1 pith:UQHHTAGQ submitted 2017-08-23 cs.CL

Automatic Detection of Fake News

classification cs.CL
keywords newsfakeautomaticcontentidentificationonlinedetectionmedia
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The proliferation of misleading information in everyday access media outlets such as social media feeds, news blogs, and online newspapers have made it challenging to identify trustworthy news sources, thus increasing the need for computational tools able to provide insights into the reliability of online content. In this paper, we focus on the automatic identification of fake content in online news. Our contribution is twofold. First, we introduce two novel datasets for the task of fake news detection, covering seven different news domains. We describe the collection, annotation, and validation process in detail and present several exploratory analysis on the identification of linguistic differences in fake and legitimate news content. Second, we conduct a set of learning experiments to build accurate fake news detectors. In addition, we provide comparative analyses of the automatic and manual identification of fake news.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RELIANCE: Curating and Evaluating Reproductive Health Information on Social Media

    cs.SI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RELIANCE is a new expert-annotated dataset of TikTok reproductive health content paired with LLM fact-checking evaluations showing 60% accuracy in sampled videos and a 15% gap between claim and full-content assessment.

  2. REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    REFLEX improves explainable fact-checking by using verdict-anchored style control and self-disagreement signals to disentangle fact from style in LLM outputs, achieving SOTA results with minimal self-refined samples.