REVIEW 3 cited by
Artificial vs Substantial Gauge Symmetries: a Criterion and an Application to the Electroweak Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Artificial vs Substantial Gauge Symmetries: a Criterion and an Application to the Electroweak Model
read the original abstract
To systematically answer the generalized Kretschmann objection, we propose a mean to make operational a criterion widely recognized as allowing to decide if the gauge symmetry of a theory is artificial or substantial. Our proposition is based on the dressing field method of gauge symmetry reduction, a new simple tool from mathematical physics. This general scheme allows in particular to straightforwardly argue that the notion of spontaneous symmetry breaking is superfluous to the empirical success of the electroweak theory. Important questions regarding the context of justification of the theory then arise.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Hidden gauge invariance
Interactions constrained purely by Hilbert space representations exhibit hidden gauge invariance, enabling string-localized formulations whose S-matrices match gauge theories without ghosts or indefinite metrics.
-
Hidden gauge invariance
Gauge invariance arises as an emergent property from Hilbert-space representations constraining interactions to be string-localized, allowing ghost-free S-matrix calculations that match standard gauge theory results.
-
Toward Manifest Relationality in Transformers via Symmetry Reduction
Transformer attention and parameter optimization can be rewritten on symmetry-reduced relational variables (Gram matrices and invariant parameter composites), removing coordinate redundancies by construction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.