Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.06059 v1 pith:MHIMPFWB submitted 2018-04-17 cs.CL

Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networks

classification cs.CL
keywords paraphraseadversarialdatascpnssyntacticsyntacticallytargetcontrolled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose syntactically controlled paraphrase networks (SCPNs) and use them to generate adversarial examples. Given a sentence and a target syntactic form (e.g., a constituency parse), SCPNs are trained to produce a paraphrase of the sentence with the desired syntax. We show it is possible to create training data for this task by first doing backtranslation at a very large scale, and then using a parser to label the syntactic transformations that naturally occur during this process. Such data allows us to train a neural encoder-decoder model with extra inputs to specify the target syntax. A combination of automated and human evaluations show that SCPNs generate paraphrases that follow their target specifications without decreasing paraphrase quality when compared to baseline (uncontrolled) paraphrase systems. Furthermore, they are more capable of generating syntactically adversarial examples that both (1) "fool" pretrained models and (2) improve the robustness of these models to syntactic variation when used to augment their training data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What the Eyes See, the LLMs Miss: Exploiting Human Perception for Adversarial Text Attacks

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HPAA uses typographic manipulations to create text that humans flag as harmful at 86%+ rates while LLM moderation systems detect it below 1% with only three queries.