REVIEW 1 cited by
End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Taxonomy Induction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Taxonomy Induction
read the original abstract
We present a novel end-to-end reinforcement learning approach to automatic taxonomy induction from a set of terms. While prior methods treat the problem as a two-phase task (i.e., detecting hypernymy pairs followed by organizing these pairs into a tree-structured hierarchy), we argue that such two-phase methods may suffer from error propagation, and cannot effectively optimize metrics that capture the holistic structure of a taxonomy. In our approach, the representations of term pairs are learned using multiple sources of information and used to determine \textit{which} term to select and \textit{where} to place it on the taxonomy via a policy network. All components are trained in an end-to-end manner with cumulative rewards, measured by a holistic tree metric over the training taxonomies. Experiments on two public datasets of different domains show that our approach outperforms prior state-of-the-art taxonomy induction methods up to 19.6\% on ancestor F1.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Taxonomy Maintenance In The Wild Over Evolving Scholarly Data: Reliability, Efficiency, and Cost-Effectiveness
GIST maintains evolving scholarly taxonomies by integrating LLM-extracted Related-Work partial hierarchies in a box-embedding space with novelty-aware coreset updates and budgeted hypothesized-concept retrieval, beati...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.