Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Aleph: A Leaderless, Asynchronous, Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus Protocol

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.05256 v2 pith:BD77NJYR submitted 2018-10-11 cs.DC

Aleph: A Leaderless, Asynchronous, Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus Protocol

classification cs.DC
keywords consensusprotocolalephalgorithmasynchronousbyzantinefaultleaderless
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we propose Aleph, a leaderless, fully asynchronous, Byzantine fault tolerant consensus protocol for ordering messages exchanged among processes. It is based on a distributed construction of a partially ordered set and the algorithm for reaching a consensus on its extension to a total order. To achieve the consensus, the processes perform computations based only on a local copy of the data structure, however, they are bound to end with the same results. Our algorithm uses a dual-threshold coin-tossing scheme as a randomization strategy and establishes the agreement in an expected constant number of rounds. In addition, we introduce a fast way of validating messages that can occur prior to determining the total ordering. This version of the protocol is deprecated. For current version see arXiv:1908.05156.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multimmit: Extending Blocks for Faster Finality

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Multimmit finalises transaction blocks in one voting round with roughly 3δ average latency from dissemination, confining a faulty producer's damage to its own chain.

  2. The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus

    cs.DC 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    A lower bound of ~2.5 on data expansion for 2-round-finality consensus, plus two 3-round protocols that achieve expansion approaching 1 under good conditions.

  3. The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus

    cs.DC 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.5

    Two-round-finality leader-based consensus cannot beat ~2.5 data expansion; three-round Carnot protocols reach near-1 under favorable conditions and 1.33–1.5 under attack.