REVIEW 2 cited by
Retrieve, Read, Rerank: Towards End-to-End Multi-Document Reading Comprehension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This paper considers the reading comprehension task in which multiple documents are given as input. Prior work has shown that a pipeline of retriever, reader, and reranker can improve the overall performance. However, the pipeline system is inefficient since the input is re-encoded within each module, and is unable to leverage upstream components to help downstream training. In this work, we present RE$^3$QA, a unified question answering model that combines context retrieving, reading comprehension, and answer reranking to predict the final answer. Unlike previous pipelined approaches, RE$^3$QA shares contextualized text representation across different components, and is carefully designed to use high-quality upstream outputs (e.g., retrieved context or candidate answers) for directly supervising downstream modules (e.g., the reader or the reranker). As a result, the whole network can be trained end-to-end to avoid the context inconsistency problem. Experiments show that our model outperforms the pipelined baseline and achieves state-of-the-art results on two versions of TriviaQA and two variants of SQuAD.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Explainable Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) with KG-SMILE
KG-SMILE applies perturbation and linear regression to a knowledge graph to attribute which entities and relations drive a GraphRAG system's answers.
-
Comparative Analysis of Lion and AdamW Optimizers for Cross-Encoder Reranking with MiniLM, GTE, and ModernBERT
Lion and AdamW are compared for reranker fine-tuning, but the reported Lion gains are confounded by a 10x learning-rate difference and an inverted GPU-utilization metric.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.