Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Triangulation: Why Optimize?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.11917 v2 pith:V3IFRUDV submitted 2019-07-27 cs.CV

Triangulation: Why Optimize?

classification cs.CV
keywords errorsparallaxmethodsolutiontriangulationacceptedaccuracyachieving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

For decades, it has been widely accepted that the gold standard for two-view triangulation is to minimize the cost based on reprojection errors. In this work, we challenge this idea. We propose a novel alternative to the classic midpoint method that leads to significantly lower 2D errors and parallax errors. It provides a numerically stable closed-form solution based solely on a pair of backprojected rays. Since our solution is rotationally invariant, it can also be applied for fisheye and omnidirectional cameras. We show that for small parallax angles, our method outperforms the state-of-the-art in terms of combined 2D, 3D and parallax accuracy, while achieving comparable speed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CuSfM: CUDA-Accelerated Structure-from-Motion

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    A CUDA-accelerated SfM system reports faster offline mapping than COLMAP and better trajectory accuracy when initialized with odometry-like poses, though the comparison is not fully fair.