REVIEW 2 cited by
Investigating Under and Overfitting in Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate under and overfitting in Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), using discriminators unseen by the generator to measure generalization. We find that the model capacity of the discriminator has a significant effect on the generator's model quality, and that the generator's poor performance coincides with the discriminator underfitting. Contrary to our expectations, we find that generators with large model capacities relative to the discriminator do not show evidence of overfitting on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and CelebA.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Provably Near-Optimal Federated Ensemble Distillation with Negligible Overhead
FedGO weights each client's prediction by the estimated density ratio of that client's data using GAN discriminators, and proves this weighting makes the ensemble at least as good as the best single model under convex loss.
-
Imputation of Longitudinal Data Using GANs: Challenges and Implications for Classification
A systematic review of GAN-based longitudinal data imputation that categorizes methods and shows that most ignore missingness mechanisms, static features, and mixed data types.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.