Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is Graph Structure Necessary for Multi-hop Question Answering?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.03096 v2 pith:7GXFN4VE submitted 2020-04-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords graphstructureansweringmulti-hopnecessaryquestionanalysisgraph-attention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, attempting to model texts as graph structure and introducing graph neural networks to deal with it has become a trend in many NLP research areas. In this paper, we investigate whether the graph structure is necessary for multi-hop question answering. Our analysis is centered on HotpotQA. We construct a strong baseline model to establish that, with the proper use of pre-trained models, graph structure may not be necessary for multi-hop question answering. We point out that both graph structure and adjacency matrix are task-related prior knowledge, and graph-attention can be considered as a special case of self-attention. Experiments and visualized analysis demonstrate that graph-attention or the entire graph structure can be replaced by self-attention or Transformers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal Multihop Source Retrieval for Web Question Answering

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A lightweight GraphSAGE model with star-graph connections outperforms a pairwise VLP transformer on image query source retrieval in WebQA, but underperforms it overall.

Pith tools