REVIEW 2 cited by
PICK: Processing Key Information Extraction from Documents using Improved Graph Learning-Convolutional Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Computer vision with state-of-the-art deep learning models has achieved huge success in the field of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) including text detection and recognition tasks recently. However, Key Information Extraction (KIE) from documents as the downstream task of OCR, having a large number of use scenarios in real-world, remains a challenge because documents not only have textual features extracting from OCR systems but also have semantic visual features that are not fully exploited and play a critical role in KIE. Too little work has been devoted to efficiently make full use of both textual and visual features of the documents. In this paper, we introduce PICK, a framework that is effective and robust in handling complex documents layout for KIE by combining graph learning with graph convolution operation, yielding a richer semantic representation containing the textual and visual features and global layout without ambiguity. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets have been conducted to show that our method outperforms baselines methods by significant margins. Our code is available at https://github.com/wenwenyu/PICK-pytorch.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
WordVIS: A Color Worth A Thousand Words
Recoloring words with a hand-crafted letter-to-color scheme improves image-only document classifiers on Tobacco-3482 by 3-5%, reaching a reported 91.14%.
-
Patchfinder: Leveraging Visual Language Models for Accurate Information Retrieval using Model Uncertainty
PatchFinder uses VLM token confidence to select patch size and the most confident patch, achieving 94% field-extraction accuracy on 190 noisy scanned well documents.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.